Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Scientific Panel Concludes Some UFO Evidence Worthy Of Study

Date:
July 1, 1998
Source:
Stanford University
Summary:
In the first independent review of UFO phenomena since 1970, a panel of scientists has concluded that some sightings are accompanied by physical evidence that deserves scientific study. But the panel was not convinced that any of this evidence points to a violation of known natural laws or the involvement of an extraterrestrial intelligence.

In the first independent review of UFO phenomena since 1970, a panel ofscientists has concluded that some sightings are accompanied by physicalevidence that deserves scientific study. But the panel was not convinced thatany of this evidence points to a violation of known natural laws or theinvolvement of an extraterrestrial intelligence.

The review was organized and directed by Peter Sturrock, professor of appliedphysics at Stanford University, and supported administratively by the Societyfor Scientific Exploration, which provides a forum for research into unexplainedphenomena. The international review panel of nine physical scientists respondedto presentations by eight investigators of UFO reports, who were asked topresent their strongest data. Von R. Eshleman, professor emeritus of electricalengineering at Stanford, co-chaired the panel.

Although UFO reports date back 50 years, the information gathered does not provethat either unknown physical processes or alien technologies are implicated. Butit does include a sufficient number of intriguing and inexplicable observations,the panel concluded. "It may be valuable to carefully evaluate UFO reports toextract information about unusual phenomena currently unknown to science." To becredible to the scientific community "such evaluations must take place with aspirit of objectivity and a willingness to evaluate rival hypotheses" that hasso far been lacking, it added.

This conclusion differs from that reached by Dr. Edward U. Condon, director ofthe Colorado Project, in his 1968 UFO report. He concluded that "furtherextensive study of UFOs probably cannot be justified in the expectation thatscience will be advanced thereby." It is very similar, however, to theconclusion reached by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics'Kuettner Report issued two years later, which advocated "a continuing,moderate-level [research] effort with emphasis on improved data collection byobjective means and on high-quality scientific analysis."

In the current study, the scientific panel focused on incidents involving someform of physical evidence, including photographic evidence, radar evidence,vehicle interference, interference with aircraft equipment, apparentgravitational or inertial effects, ground traces, injuries to vegetation,physiological effects on witnesses, and debris. Of particular concern arereports that UFO encounters may be hazardous to people's health. Some witnesseshave reportedly suffered radiation-type injuries. These reports led the panel todraw the attention of the medical community to the possible health risksinvolved.

The scientists found that some of the reported incidents may have been caused byrare natural phenomena, such as electrical activity high above thunderstorms orradar ducting (the trapping and conducting of radar waves by atmosphericchannels). However, the panel found that some of the phenomena related to UFOsare not easy to explain in this fashion.

Further analysis of the evidence presented to the panel is unlikely to shedadded light on the causes underlying the reports, the scientists said. Mostcurrent UFO investigations lack the level of rigor required by the scientificcommunity, despite the initiative and dedication of the investigators involved.But new data, scientifically acquired and analyzed, could yield usefulinformation and advance our understanding of the UFO problem, the panel said.

The reviewers also made the following observations:

  • The UFO problem is not a simple one, and it is unlikely that there is anysimple, universal answer.
  • Whenever there are unexplained observations, there is the possibility thatscientists will learn something new by studying them.
  • Studies should concentrate on cases that include as much independentphysical evidence as possible.
  • Continuing contact between the UFO community and physical scientists couldbe productive.
  • Institutional support for research in this area is desirable.

The review panel consisted of Von Eshleman; Thomas Holzer, High AltitudeObservatory in Boulder, Colo.; Randy Jokipii, professor of planetary science,University of Arizona, Tucson; Francois Louange, managing director of Fleximage,Paris, France; H. J. Melosh, professor of planetary science, University ofArizona, Tucson; James J. Papike, professor of earth and planetary sciences,University of New Mexico, Albuquerque; Guenther Reitz, German Aerospace Center,Institute for Aerospace Medicine, Cologne, Germany; Charles Tolbert, professorof astronomy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville; and Bernard Veyret,Bioelectromagnetics Laboratory, University of Bordeaux, France. Eshleman andHolzer served as co-chairs of the panel.

The UFO investigators who presented evidence were Richard Haines, Los Altos,Calif.; Illobrand von Ludwiger, Germany; Mark Rodeghier, Center for UFO Studies,Chicago; John Schuessler, Houston; Erling Strand, Ostfold College, Skjeberg,Norway; Michael Swords, professor of natural science, Western MichiganUniversity, Kalamazoo; Jacques Vallee, San Francisco; and Jean-Jacques Velasco,CNES, Toulouse, France.

The study was initiated by Laurance S. Rockefeller and supported financially bythe LSR Fund.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Stanford University. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

Stanford University. "Scientific Panel Concludes Some UFO Evidence Worthy Of Study." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 1 July 1998. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/07/980701082300.htm>.
Stanford University. (1998, July 1). Scientific Panel Concludes Some UFO Evidence Worthy Of Study. ScienceDaily. Retrieved August 1, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/07/980701082300.htm
Stanford University. "Scientific Panel Concludes Some UFO Evidence Worthy Of Study." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/07/980701082300.htm (accessed August 1, 2014).

Share This




More Matter & Energy News

Friday, August 1, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Tesla, Panasonic Ink Deal To Make Huge Battery 'Gigafactory'

Tesla, Panasonic Ink Deal To Make Huge Battery 'Gigafactory'

Newsy (July 31, 2014) The deal will help build a massive battery factory that Tesla says will produce 500,000 lithium batteries by 2020. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways

Britain Testing Driverless Cars on Roadways

AP (July 30, 2014) British officials said on Wednesday that driverless cars will be tested on roads in as many as three cities in a trial program set to begin in January. Officials said the tests will last up to three years. (July 30) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
7 Ways to Use Toothpaste: Howdini Hacks

7 Ways to Use Toothpaste: Howdini Hacks

Howdini (July 30, 2014) Fresh breath and clean teeth are great, but have you ever thought, "my toothpaste could be doing more". Well, it can! Lots of things! Howdini has 7 new uses for this household staple. Video provided by Howdini
Powered by NewsLook.com
Smoked: 2015 Ducati Diavel Vs 2014 Chevy Corvette Stingray Drag Race

Smoked: 2015 Ducati Diavel Vs 2014 Chevy Corvette Stingray Drag Race

Cycle World (July 30, 2014) The Bonnier Motorcycle Group presents Smoked; a three part video series. In this episode the 2015 Ducati Diavel takes on the 2014 Chevy Corvette Stingray Video provided by Cycle World
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins