Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Human Factors Experts At Sandia Take New Approach To Studying Human Failure In Engineered Systems

Date:
February 8, 2000
Source:
Sandia National Laboratories
Summary:
Taking a lesson from nuclear weapons surety, Chris Forsythe and Caren Wenner of the Department of Energy's Sandia National Laboratories have come up with a new approach to studying how and why engineered systems fail due to the actions or inaction of humans.

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. -- Taking a lesson from nuclear weapons surety, Chris Forsythe and Caren Wenner of the Department of Energy's Sandia National Laboratories have come up with a new approach to studying how and why engineered systems fail due to the actions or inaction of humans.

Engineered systems are systems designed by humans to operate in a certain way and encompassing all combinations of hardware, software, and people, including systems that consist entirely of people. And since engineered systems are found throughout the world in transportation, communications, financial institutions, utilities, and more, understanding what causes people to fail when working in them is crucial.

"Instead of systematically trying to determine all the possible things a person might do wrong -- the traditional method -- we are looking at identifying conditions and environmental factors that make any one of the universe of potential human failures more probable," says Forsythe, a member of Sandia's Statistics and Human Factors Department. "Mitigating these factors can lead to enhanced surety of engineered systems, such as nuclear weapons."

The idea for the new way of studying human involvement in an engineered system came to Forsythe and Wenner while involved in an internal Sandia surety project last year.

"Surety involves assuring nuclear weapons safety, security, and reliability without precisely characterizing all possible threats," Forsythe says. "It occurred to us that a similar approach might work for studying why people make mistakes when working in engineered systems."

The standard human factors technique for figuring out how to prevent error is to conduct a detailed analysis that attempts to establish a near-exhaustive list of everything that is likely to go wrong.

"After you've done this a long time, you get good at it," says Forsythe, who has a Ph.D. in cognitive psychology. "But it can be labor intensive. Also, you always miss some things. The problem that humans bring to systems is the infinite number of ways they can fail. You can never hope to anticipate all that can go wrong."

Instead of focusing on the output, the errors, Forsythe and Wenner are concentrating on input, what causes failure. Their goal is to identify and correct conditions that make errors more likely to occur.

They call their method the Organic Model -- organic because an engineered system grows, changes, and becomes more vulnerable with each human interaction. They recognize that introduction of humans in an engineered system actually causes the entire system to take on organic properties (properties that are associated with all living systems) and that to fully evaluate the performance, safety, security, etc., of a system, these properties must be considered.

"All engineered systems have a human footprint," Wenner says. "Humans design, build, and maintain the system. There's no getting the human factor out of an engineered system."

Taking into account that a primary effect of humans on an engineered system is the introduction of variability to the system, Forsythe and Wenner ask two fundamental questions -- what are factors that cause variability and when is a system intolerant of variability? Additionally, although the goal is obviously to reduce the potential for error, it is equally important to understand the potential impact of errors that do occur, and to mitigate this impact where possible, Wenner says.

For example, the pair might go to a production site to assess a system's vulnerability. While their analysis will pinpoint many likely human errors, much of their attention will focus on conditions that make human error more probable in general. Simple examples might include the number of people working rotating shifts in critical areas, overtime hours, and if the work is externally or self-paced -- all factors that could contribute to any one of a million possible mistakes by humans.

Forsythe and Wenner are building on work started more than 20 years ago by retired Sandian Alan Swain, who wrote the Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, which has become a basic guide for many in the human factors field. This was one of the first publications in human factors to focus on conditions in the environment that make people fail, and not exclusively on how to improve human performance, making it faster and better. Human reliability has remained a core competency at Sandia.

Forsythe and Wenner have received invitations to discuss this work in professional arenas and have plans to conduct a workshop at the Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting in San Diego.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Sandia National Laboratories. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

Sandia National Laboratories. "Human Factors Experts At Sandia Take New Approach To Studying Human Failure In Engineered Systems." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 8 February 2000. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/02/000208074923.htm>.
Sandia National Laboratories. (2000, February 8). Human Factors Experts At Sandia Take New Approach To Studying Human Failure In Engineered Systems. ScienceDaily. Retrieved July 29, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/02/000208074923.htm
Sandia National Laboratories. "Human Factors Experts At Sandia Take New Approach To Studying Human Failure In Engineered Systems." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/02/000208074923.htm (accessed July 29, 2014).

Share This




More Matter & Energy News

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Baluchistan Mining Eyes an Uncertain Future

Baluchistan Mining Eyes an Uncertain Future

AFP (July 29, 2014) Coal mining is one of the major industries in Baluchistan but a lack of infrastructure and frequent accidents mean that the area has yet to hit its potential. Duration: 01:58 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short

Easier Nuclear Construction Promises Fall Short

AP (July 29, 2014) The U.S. nuclear industry started building its first new plants using prefabricated Lego-like blocks meant to save time and prevent the cost overruns that crippled the sector decades ago. So far, it's not working. (July 29) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Lithium Battery 'Holy Grail' Could Provide 4 Times The Power

Lithium Battery 'Holy Grail' Could Provide 4 Times The Power

Newsy (July 28, 2014) Stanford University published its findings for a "pure" lithium ion battery that could have our everyday devices and electric cars running longer. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming

The Carbon Trap: US Exports Global Warming

AP (July 28, 2014) AP Investigation: As the Obama administration weans the country off dirty fuels, energy companies are ramping-up overseas coal exports at a heavy price. (July 28) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins