ScienceDaily (Dec. 3, 2008) — In conventional macroeconomic thinking, the money supply is considered the main determinant of long-run inflation. A variety of monetary aggregates have been proposed to measure the money supply. Yet, nowadays, monetary aggregates play little role in monetary policy deliberations at most central banks.

A new study in the Journal of Money, Credit and Banking examines the leading arguments for assigning an important role to tracking the growth of monetary aggregates when making decisions about monetary policy. The analysis finds that none of the arguments provides a compelling reason to assign a prominent role to monetary aggregates.

Michael Woodford of Columbia University reviews several of the most important arguments that have been made for paying attention to money, considering both the omissions of an analysis without money and the advantages of the information revealed by monetary trends.

While they do have their uses, Woodford contends that monetary aggregates should not be used as policy targets or assigned a prominent role in monetary policy strategy.

The economy’s current condition and projected evolution under alternative policy paths may depend on a large number of unobserved variables. Monetary aggregates, along with other indicators, can be used to provide information about these unobserved variables, though there is little theoretical or empirical ground to think that these measures are especially revealing about any of the unobserved variables that are most crucial for accurate projections. Monetary aggregates thus may help to determine the appropriate policy, but only along many other variables and not in a way that would make them targets in the conduct of policy.

“When one examines the reasons that have been primarily responsible for the appeal of the idea of money growth as a simple diagnostic for monetary policy, one finds that they will not support the weight that they are asked to bear,” Woodford notes.

Journal reference:

1. Michael Woodford. How Important Is Money in the Conduct of Monetary Policy? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2008; 40 (8): 1561-1598 [link]

Related Stories

Waiting For The Pay Off: Psychologists Show That 'Money Changes Everything' (Feb. 28, 2007) — It's been said by everyone from Cyndi Lauper to Alex Rodriguez that "money changes everything." Now psychologists at Washington University in St. Louis have published a paper to support that claim. ...  > read more

Gender, Geography Influence Floral Purchases (Mar. 25, 2009) — Researchers in Taiwan seek to identify the consumption value that consumers seek from floral products, while clarifying the context of these values. Consumers from three main cities in Taiwan were ...  > read more

Cost Containment Focus Could Have Consequences For Health Care Delivery (Jan. 7, 2009) — The drive toward containing health care costs could have the unintended consequence of reducing physician productivity, impairing quality and perhaps even increasing costs according to an article in ...  > read more

Ecologists And Ethicists Urge Scientists To Speak Out On Environmental Policy (May 19, 2009) — Should environmental scientists be advocates for environmental policy? To a wildlife ecologist and an environmental ethicist, the answer is a resounding ...  > read more

Search ScienceDaily

Virtual Reality For Construction Zones