Sep. 4, 2013 Signs banning smoking may not have as much of an impact on secondhand smoke concentrations as the presence of ashtrays or ashtray equivalents, according to research published September 4 in the open access journal PLOS ONE by Constantine Vardavas from the Harvard School of Public Health and colleagues from other institutions.
The authors measured the success of a non-enforced, nationwide smoke-free legislation in Greece by testing levels of secondhand smoke before the ban and for two years afterward. Following the 2010 legislation, secondhand smoke concentrations dropped immediately, but gradually increased again in subsequent measurements. However, all measurements after the ban remained significantly lower than levels of secondhand smoke measured before the legislation.
They found that outdoor or indoor signs that banned smoking did not correlate with levels of secondhand smoke in areas where signs were posted. However, the presence of ashtrays, or ashtray equivalents, such as candleholders, was strongly associated with a higher concentration of secondhand smoke. Based on their results, the authors conclude "While the public may be supportive of smoke-free legislation, adherence may decline rapidly if enforcement is limited or non-existent. Moreover, enforcement agencies should also focus on the comprehensive removal of ashtray equivalents that could act as a cue for smoking within a venue."
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:
The above story is based on materials provided by Public Library of Science.
- Constantine I. Vardavas, Israel Agaku, Evridiki Patelarou, Nektarios Anagnostopoulos, Chrysanthi Nakou, Vassiliki Dramba, Gianna Giourgouli, Paraskevi Argyropoulou, Antonis Antoniadis, Konstantinos Gourgoulianis, Despoina Ourda, Lambros Lazuras, Monique Bertic, Christos Lionis, Gregory Connolly, Panagiotis Behrakis. Ashtrays and Signage as Determinants of a Smoke-Free Legislation’s Success. PLoS ONE, 2013; 8 (9): e72945 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072945
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.