While significant progress has been made towards achieving universal access to HIV prevention, treatment and care, with a consistent increase in funding for the AIDS sector between 2001 and 2008 resulting in an estimated 5.2 million people receiving life-saving treatment by 2009, compared with only 500,000 in 2003, the IAS report reveals that the progress made in the sector is under threat; the current economic challenges combined with a waning political will and a flat-lining of resources are preventing the international community from making universal access a reality.

AIDS 2010 took place in Vienna in July 2010 at a critical moment in the push for expanded access to HIV services. Coinciding with the original 2010 deadline set by world leaders for achieving universal access to HIV prevention, treatment and care, the conference was an important platform for ensuring that the universal access pledge remains on the global health agenda.

Dialogue on universal access during AIDS 2010 focused on two core issues: securing the required resources from international donors and national governments; and making more effective and efficient use of available resources. A key theme among speakers was the challenging economic climate, with principal donors including PEPFAR, the World Bank, UNITAID, and the Global Fund experiencing funding reductions or failing to increase funding in line with needs. The World Bank estimated that the cumulative effect of a diminished scale-up effort over five years would be approximately ten million deaths and 14 million newly infected individuals.

The replenishment of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria was of major concern to conference delegates, as political leaders and activists alike advocated for the full replenishment of the Fund in the October 2010 Replenishment Meeting. Recognised by the international community as an effective mechanism through which to disburse large amounts of resources rapidly, the replenishment of the Global Fund is vital to reaching both the health related MDGs and universal access by 2015. These concerns have since been proved right, with donors pledging only US $11.7 billion earlier this month -- less than the lowest of the three financing scenarios envisaged by the Global Fund. This amount will feasibly only allow for the continuation of funding of existing programmes, with new programmes being funded at significantly lower levels than in recent years.

The question of whether or not the international AIDS community should concentrate on doing more with fewer resources, or whether it should continue to advocate for increased resources to fight HIV and AIDS was heavily debated at the conference, in particular in light of the new WHO treatment guidelines as well as recent advances in prevention and treatment technologies. While the push for greater efficiencies is imperative, there was unquestionable consensus that efficiencies alone cannot make up for the large gap in needed resources.

"UNAIDS used AIDS 2010 to launch the new Treatment 2.0 platform which emphasizes the prevention of new HIV infections in a way which is smarter, faster and better. Treatment 2.0 is rooted in the notion that HIV infections can be cut by up to one-third if there is a significant change in how ARVs are provided. This means increased coverage, which in turn means more resources," said IAS President Elly Katabira. "Improved efficiencies are essential, however the scale of current unmet need and the fact that an additional 30-50% of HIV-positive people are eligible to start ART immediately under new WHO treatment guidelines, means universal access cannot and will not be achieved without a substantial increase in resources for AIDS. At this critical juncture in the international AIDS response, we should not be talking about doing more with less, but doing more with more."

The report confirms that the HIV response has rapidly scaled up in recent years as a result not only of increased bilateral and multilateral funding, but also due to the reduction in the cost of treatment and the application of innovative methods of prevention. Key stakeholders in the HIV response have also adapted to the effective utilization of additional health-related platforms such as maternal and child health and family planning. The progress and results that have been achieved, while significant, remain below the targets for universal access. Programme scale-up based on demonstrated good practice, programme efficiency gains, and the continued call for increased resources to avert millions of infections worldwide, are essential to ensure that Universal Access to the prevention, care and treatment of HIV and AIDS will be a reality by 2015.

Report: Universal Access: Right Here, Right Now

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

• HIV and AIDS
• Infectious Diseases
• STD

• World Development
• Funding Policy
• Public Health

• HIV test
• Trichomoniasis
• Sexually transmitted disease
• Antiretroviral drug
• Public health
• Transmission (medicine)