Science News
from research organizations

New study examines post-Roe v. Wade arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women

Date:
January 17, 2013
Source:
Duke University Press
Summary:
A new study looks at criminal and civil cases in which a woman's pregnancy was a deciding factor leading to deprivations of her physical liberty.
Share:
       
FULL STORY

"Arrests of and Forced Interventions on Pregnant Women in the United States, 1973-2005: Implications for Women's Legal Status and Public Health," an article by Lynn M. Paltrow and Jeanne Flavin in the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (volume 38, issue 2), offers a groundbreaking, in-depth look at criminal and civil cases in which a woman's pregnancy was a deciding factor leading to attempted and actual deprivations of her physical liberty.

As "personhood" measures are promoted and the fortieth anniversary of Roe v. Wade approaches, this article broadens the conversation from one about abortion to one about health policy and the legal status of pregnant women.

Paltrow and Flavin identified 413 cases involving arrests, detentions, and equivalent deprivations of pregnant women's physical liberty between 1973 and 2005. The authors examine key characteristics of the women and cases (including socioeconomic status and race); identify the legal claims used to support the arrests, detentions, and forced interventions; and explore the role that health care providers played in facilitating deprivations of pregnant women's liberty.

The data presented in this study challenge the idea that such interventions are rare and isolated events. Analysis reveals how existing laws, including feticide statutes, have been used to justify the arrests of pregnant women; provides evidence of what is likely to occur if personhood measures pass; and highlights the ways in which arrests and forced interventions undermine maternal, fetal, and child health.

Paltrow and Flavin's unparalleled documentation and analysis of cases offers a basis for building a shared political agenda that advances public health and ensures that pregnant women do not lose their civil and human rights.


Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Duke University Press. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. L. M. Paltrow, J. Flavin. Arrests of and Forced Interventions on Pregnant Women in the United States, 1973-2005: Implications for Women's Legal Status and Public Health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2013; DOI: 10.1215/03616878-1966324

Cite This Page:

Duke University Press. "New study examines post-Roe v. Wade arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 17 January 2013. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130117105845.htm>.
Duke University Press. (2013, January 17). New study examines post-Roe v. Wade arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women. ScienceDaily. Retrieved August 28, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130117105845.htm
Duke University Press. "New study examines post-Roe v. Wade arrests of and forced interventions on pregnant women." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130117105845.htm (accessed August 28, 2015).

Share This Page: