Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Decision Makers May Be Blind To The Outcome Of Their Choice

Date:
October 7, 2005
Source:
Swedish Research Council
Summary:
When evaluating facial attractiveness, participants may fail to notice a radical change to the outcome of their choice, according to a study by researchers at Lund University, Sweden, and New York University. Equally surprising, the study shows that participants may produce confabulatory reports when asked to describe the reasons behind their choices. The findings appear in the October 7 issue of Science.

Researchers showed picture-pairs of female faces to the participants and asked them to choose which face in each pair they found most attractive. In addition, immediately after their choice, they were asked to verbally describe the reasons for choosing the way they did. Unknown to the participants, on certain trials, a card magic trick was used to secretly exchange one face for the other. Thus, on these trials, the outcome of the choice became the opposite of what they intended.
Credit: Photo grapher: Mark Hanlon

Theauthors on this paper are Petter Johansson, a graduate student; LarsHall, a researcher; Sverker Sikstrφm, an assistant professor; all fromLund University Cognitive Science; and Andreas Olsson, a graduatestudent in NYU's Department of Psychology.

Researchers showedpicture-pairs of female faces to the participants and asked them tochoose which face in each pair they found most attractive. In addition,immediately after their choice, they were asked to verbally describethe reasons for choosing the way they did. Unknown to the participants,on certain trials, a card magic trick was used to secretly exchange oneface for the other. Thus, on these trials, the outcome of the choicebecame the opposite of what they intended.

The researchersmeasured whether the participants noticed that something went wrongwith their choice, both concurrently, during the experimental task, andretrospectively through a post-experimental interview. Less than 10% ofall manipulations were detected immediately by the participants, andcounting all forms of detection no more than a fifth of all manipulatedtrials were exposed. The researchers call this effect choice blindness.

Theoriesabout decision-making generally assume that we recognize when ourintentions and the outcome of our choices do not match up, but thisstudy shows that this assumption is not necessarily correct. Byshedding new light on the links between intentions and outcomes, theseresults challenges both current theories of decision making, and commonsense notions of choice and self-knowledge.

The researchers alsosought to understand if the verbal reports given by the participantsdiffered between the faces that they actually chose, and the ones thatthey ended up with in a manipulated trial. "Based on common sense aloneone might suspect that the reports given for normal trials and for themanipulated trials would differ in many ways", said Hall. "After all,revealing the reasons behind a choice is something we very often do ineveryday life. But revealing the reasons behind a choice we did notmake is a very strange thing indeed."

However, using a variety ofmeasures, the researchers found that the two types of reports wereremarkably similar. ''When asked to motivate their choices, theparticipants delivered their verbal reports with the same confidence,and with the same level of detail and emotionality for the faces thatthat were not chosen, as for the ones that were actually chosen''Johansson said.

Despite the intimate familiarity we have witheveryday decision making, it is very difficult to determine what we canknow about this process from the 'inside', by reflection andintrospection. A great barrier for scientific research in this domainis the nature of subjectivity. How can researchers ever verify thereports of the participants involved, when they have no means ofchallenging them? But by using choice blindness as an instrument, theresearchers were able to 'get between' the decisions of theparticipants and the outcomes they were presented with. "Our experimentintroduces an entirely novel methodology that can be used toinvestigate choice and introspection'' Hall said. ''This may lead to animproved understanding of the processes behind both truthful andconfabulatory reports''


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Swedish Research Council. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

Swedish Research Council. "Decision Makers May Be Blind To The Outcome Of Their Choice." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 7 October 2005. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051007091302.htm>.
Swedish Research Council. (2005, October 7). Decision Makers May Be Blind To The Outcome Of Their Choice. ScienceDaily. Retrieved August 29, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051007091302.htm
Swedish Research Council. "Decision Makers May Be Blind To The Outcome Of Their Choice." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051007091302.htm (accessed August 29, 2014).

Share This




More Mind & Brain News

Friday, August 29, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Treadmill 'trips' May Reduce Falls for Elderly

Treadmill 'trips' May Reduce Falls for Elderly

AP (Aug. 28, 2014) — Scientists are tripping the elderly on purpose in a Chicago lab in an effort to better prevent seniors from falling and injuring themselves in real life. (Aug.28) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Alice in Wonderland Syndrome

Alice in Wonderland Syndrome

Ivanhoe (Aug. 27, 2014) — It’s an unusual condition with a colorful name. Kids with “Alice in Wonderland” syndrome see sudden distortions in objects they’re looking at or their own bodies appear to change size, a lot like the main character in the Lewis Carroll story. Video provided by Ivanhoe
Powered by NewsLook.com
Stopping Schizophrenia Before Birth

Stopping Schizophrenia Before Birth

Ivanhoe (Aug. 27, 2014) — Scientists have long called choline a “brain booster” essential for human development. Not only does it aid in memory and learning, researchers now believe choline could help prevent mental illness. Video provided by Ivanhoe
Powered by NewsLook.com
Personalized Brain Vaccine for Glioblastoma

Personalized Brain Vaccine for Glioblastoma

Ivanhoe (Aug. 27, 2014) — Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive brain cancer in humans. Now a new treatment using the patient’s own tumor could help slow down its progression and help patients live longer. Video provided by Ivanhoe
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:  

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:  

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile iPhone Android Web
Follow Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins