Science News
from research organizations

Promoting healthy skepticism in the news: Helping journalists get it right

Date:
November 21, 2009
Source:
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Summary:
A new editorial discusses the exaggerated fears and hopes that often appear in news coverage of cancer research.
Share:
         
Total shares:  
FULL STORY

An editorial published online November 20 in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute discusses the exaggerated fears and hopes that often appear in news coverage of cancer research. The editorial provides guidance for both the media and journals to help alleviate the problem.

Lisa M. Schwartz, M.D., M.S., and Steven Woloshin, M.D., M.S., of Center for Medicine and the Media at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice in New Hampshire, and Barnett S. Kramer, M.D., editor-in-chief of the JNCI, use recent media coverage of two studies from the New England Journal of Medicine and the JNCI to demonstrate their point.

Coverage of trial results of the new anti-cancer drug olaparib, which appeared in the NEJM, exaggerated hope in many ways. One national news outlet claimed the drug "was the most important cancer breakthrough of the decade," but failed to note that the study was uncontrolled (so there is no way to know if the drug accounted for the findings), and very preliminary (it is not known if the findings will ever translate into longer life).

The editorialists also point to coverage of a JNCI article on alcohol consumption and cancer risk among women, which may have caused unwarranted fear: "A drink a day raises women's risk of cancer," read one newspaper headline. Unfortunately, the coverage did not provide the magnitude of the risk. Comparing the highest level of drinking (≥15 drinks a week) to the lowest (one to two drinks per week), the investigators observed a 0.6% absolute increase in the risk of breast cancer diagnosis: from 2% to 2.6% for more than 7 years.

Journalists are not the only ones to blame, though, according to the editorialists. Medical journals sometimes leave important elements out of studies. In many cases, absolute risks and study limitations are omitted from the abstracts and journal press releases.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

Journal of the National Cancer Institute. "Promoting healthy skepticism in the news: Helping journalists get it right." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 21 November 2009. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091121093231.htm>.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. (2009, November 21). Promoting healthy skepticism in the news: Helping journalists get it right. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 27, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091121093231.htm
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. "Promoting healthy skepticism in the news: Helping journalists get it right." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091121093231.htm (accessed April 27, 2015).

Share This Page:


Health & Medicine News
April 27, 2015

Latest Headlines
updated 12:56 pm ET