New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Probabilistic modeling of verbal autopsy data is best for public health decision making, study finds

Date:
August 17, 2010
Source:
Public Library of Science
Summary:
Computer-based probabilistic models that are used to interpret verbal autopsy data -- information from interviews with family, friends and carers about deaths that are later interpreted into possible cause(s) of death -- are as effective as physician reviews of the data for establishing cause of death, according to new research.
Share:
FULL STORY

Computer-based probabilistic models that are used to interpret verbal autopsy data- information from interviews with family, friends and carers about deaths that are later interpreted into possible cause(s) of death- are as effective as physician reviews of the data for establishing cause of death, according to research by Peter Byass from Umeå University, Sweden, and colleagues from Witwatersrand University, South Africa, that is published in PLoS Medicine.

Probabilistic modeling is cheaper and faster than physician review and also completely internally consistent. Therefore, in many circumstances, probabilistic modeling is the best available means of incorporating data on deaths into public health actions.

The authors compared and contrasted physician reviews and probabilistic modeling as applied to verbal autopsies from a series of 6,153 deaths that occurred in a rural South African population from 1992 to 2005. The ten highest-ranking causes of mortality accounted for 83% and 88% of all deaths by physician interpretation and probabilistic modeling respectively, and eight of the highest ten causes were common to both approaches. Therefore, the authors say that there were no differences between physician interpretation and probabilistic modeling that might have led to substantially different public health policy conclusions at the population level. Physician interpretation was more nuanced than the model, for example in identifying cancers at particular sites, but the model was able to capture the uncertainty associated with individual cases.

The authors explain that the main aim of this paper is not to provide a validation of any particular verbal autopsy method, but to consider alternative approaches for handling interview data on individual deaths to give meaningful pictures of population health They conclude: "where [verbal autopsy] is used within routine health services, probabilistic modeling with its consistent approach over time and place, the elimination of inter- and intra-assessor variation, faster results, and much lower cost, should be the interpretative method of choice."


Story Source:

Materials provided by Public Library of Science. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Byass P, Kahn K, Fottrell E, Collinson MA, Tollman SM. Moving from Data on Deaths to Public Health Policy in Agincourt, South Africa: Approaches to Analysing and Understanding Verbal Autopsy Findings. PLoS Medicine, 2010; 7 (8): e1000325 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000325

Cite This Page:

Public Library of Science. "Probabilistic modeling of verbal autopsy data is best for public health decision making, study finds." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 17 August 2010. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100817171553.htm>.
Public Library of Science. (2010, August 17). Probabilistic modeling of verbal autopsy data is best for public health decision making, study finds. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 29, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100817171553.htm
Public Library of Science. "Probabilistic modeling of verbal autopsy data is best for public health decision making, study finds." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100817171553.htm (accessed March 29, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES