Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Study confirms CT lung cancer screens save lives; other analyses underway

June 29, 2011
Brown University
A new report confirms an initial announcement by the National Cancer Institute of a 20-percent reduction in lung cancer deaths in heavy smokers by using helical low-dose CT screening versus X-rays. The study provides a deeper description of that finding, but does not yet answer important questions about cost-effectiveness, health care utilization, or changes in smoking behavior. Those analyses are underway and results could be available later this year.

Research results from the National Lung Screening Trial, published online June 29 in the New England Journal of Medicine confirm that helical low-dose CT (LDCT) scans for lung cancer reduce deaths in heavy smokers by 20 percent compared to X-ray scans, but several other key findings from the data gathered in the study, including cost-effectiveness, will be released in the next six months, said a Brown University statistician who helped lead the massive government-funded study.

Related Articles

"The results of the study say that the time has come for considering LDCT screening for lung cancer," said Constantine Gatsonis, one of the two leading statisticians in the NLST and chair of biostatistics in the public health program of the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. "For the first time we have a study that says, 'Yes, you can actually reduce lung cancer mortality in heavy smokers via screening.' This is tremendous."

The need for further analysis is significant because screening is only one procedure in a much broader health care process, said Ilana Gareen, assistant professor of epidemiology in Brown's Center for Statistical Sciences and a co-author of the paper. She and Gatsonis noted that LDCT scans have a high false-positive rate that can lead to follow-up screens and biopsies even when there is ultimately no cancer. After three rounds of annual screening with LDCT, for example, 39.1 percent of participants had at least one screen result that was positive for lung cancer. The vast majority of such findings were false alarms.

"The impact of LDCT screening on lung cancer mortality cannot be considered in isolation," Gareen said. "The screening and subsequent diagnostic work-up will also impact patients' emotional and physical health and will result in increased levels of health care utilization that may tax an already over-burdened health care system. To provide information for patients and decision makers, we are studying these downstream consequences."

Deeper analyses underway

Researchers at Brown, Dartmouth, and the National Cancer Institute are building statistical simulation models that will allow them to predict the effects of screening in populations beyond the 53,454 people studied in the NLST, said Gatsonis, whose work in the study was conducted in association with the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) where Gatsonis is director of the Biostatistics and Data Management Center. The study focused on people aged 55 to 74 who smoked for at least 30 "pack years" (i.e., a pack a day for 30 years or two packs a day for 15 years).

The models may also be able to provide health officials with guidance on whether people would still benefit if they were screened every other year instead of annually.

Gatsonis's group at Brown and ACRIN, which includes four authors of the New England Journal of Medicine paper, expects to publish analyses of three other aspects of the data over the next six months: differences in post-screening smoking behavior between patients who received X-ray and helical LDCT scans; differences in utilization of health care between the two groups; and, under the leadership of Dr. William Black at Dartmouth, the cost-effectiveness of helical LDCT scans versus X-rays.

The New England Journal of Medicine paper's authors said the cost-effectiveness analysis is vital to formulating a recommendation for patient care or insurance reimbursement.

"Before crafting public policy recommendations, the cost-effectiveness of helical LDCT screening must be rigorously analyzed," they wrote. "Against the reduction in lung cancer mortality, the harms from false positive screening results and overdiagnosis and costs must also be weighed."

The study's Brown University authors, in addition to Gatsonis and Gareen, are Amanda Adams and JoRean Sicks.

The research was funded by the National Cancer Institute.

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Brown University. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

Journal Reference:

  1. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening. New England Journal of Medicine, 2011; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873

Cite This Page:

Brown University. "Study confirms CT lung cancer screens save lives; other analyses underway." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 29 June 2011. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110629181845.htm>.
Brown University. (2011, June 29). Study confirms CT lung cancer screens save lives; other analyses underway. ScienceDaily. Retrieved January 26, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110629181845.htm
Brown University. "Study confirms CT lung cancer screens save lives; other analyses underway." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110629181845.htm (accessed January 26, 2015).

Share This

More From ScienceDaily

More Health & Medicine News

Monday, January 26, 2015

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Ebola Mistakes Should Serve a Lesson Says WHO

Ebola Mistakes Should Serve a Lesson Says WHO

AFP (Jan. 25, 2015) The World Health Organization&apos;s chief on Sunday admitted the UN agency had been caught napping on Ebola, saying it should serve a lesson to avoid similar mistakes in future. Duration: 00:55 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Disneyland Measles Outbreak Spreads To 5 States

Disneyland Measles Outbreak Spreads To 5 States

Newsy (Jan. 24, 2015) Much of the Disneyland measles outbreak is being blamed on the anti-vaccination movement. The CDC encourages just about everyone get immunized. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Growing Measles Outbreak Worries Calif. Parents

Growing Measles Outbreak Worries Calif. Parents

AP (Jan. 23, 2015) Public health officials are rushing to contain a measles outbreak that has sickened 70 people across 6 states and Mexico. The AP&apos;s Raquel Maria Dillon has more. (Jan. 23) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Smart Wristband to Shock Away Bad Habits

Smart Wristband to Shock Away Bad Habits

Reuters - Innovations Video Online (Jan. 23, 2015) A Boston start-up is developing a wristband they say will help users break bad habits by jolting them with an electric shock. Ben Gruber reports. Video provided by Reuters
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.


Breaking News:

Strange & Offbeat Stories

Health & Medicine

Mind & Brain

Living & Well

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News


Free Subscriptions

Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile

Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?

Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins