Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

How people assign blame: Cohesive groups hold members less responsible for individual actions

Date:
December 8, 2011
Source:
Boston College
Summary:
Researchers have shown that the more cohesive a group appears -- be it a corporation, political party, governmental entity, pro sports team or other organization -- the more likely it is that people will hold its members less responsible for their own individual actions. The study area raises questions about decision-making, blame, moral judgment and the effects of a strong brand image.

Who gets the blame when a member of a group does something wrong -- the individual or the group? The answer may depend on how cohesive the group is perceived to be.

Related Articles


New findings from researchers at Boston College and Northwestern University show that the more cohesive a group appears -- be it a corporation, political party, governmental entity, pro sports team or other organization -- the more likely it is that people will hold its members less responsible for their own individual actions. The study, published in the current issue of the journal Psychological Science, sheds light on why people tend to address hostility toward large companies or other collectives, while still treating members of those groups as unique individuals.

The researchers -- Liane Young, assistant professor of psychology at Boston College and Adam Waytz, assistant professor of management and organizations at Northwestern University -- suggest that the more people judge a group to have a "mind" -- that is, the ability to think, intend or plan -- the less they judge a member of that group to have his or her own capacity to think, intend or plan, and vice versa. The authors refer to this as the "trade off" in the way people view the group versus the way they view individuals in the group.

"We thought there might be certain cases where instead of attributing mind to individuals, people actually attribute mind to the group," said Young. "For instance, if you're a Democrat, you might think that the Republican party has an agenda, a mind of its own, but that each individual Republican is just following the crowd, incapable of independent thought. That's the trade-off we're after, between group mind and member mind."

Similarly, a strong brand image, generally considered to be a corporate or organizational asset, could contribute to consumers' perception of single-mindedness, meaning the brand would be more likely to be held accountable for its employees' or members' actions.

Their study sought to investigate this idea of "group mind," as well as the consequences of those attributions for both groups and their members. The relationship between "group mind" and "group-member mind" has been largely unexplored, the authors say, but it raises interesting questions about decision-making, blame and moral judgment.

"We think the topic of whether people think of groups as having minds has a number of implications for legal decisions, such as regarding conspiracy -- a charge that requires collective intent, how people think about social movements and their members, as well as judgments of corporate personhood," added Waytz."When people consider corporations to be mindful entities, this gives them moral rights, such as the right to contribute to political campaigns as was granted to them by the Supreme Court last year, as well as legal responsibilities."

Predicting that an inverse relationship exists between attributions of group mind and member mind -- the researchers conducted four experiments to test their theory.

The first established the premise that the more "mind" that people attribute to groups, the less "mind" they attribute to group members. The researchers asked participants to evaluate groups including specific corporations, professional sports teams and government entities on the extent to which each group has a mind of its own, the extent to which each average member of that group has a mind of his/her own, and the extent to which each group is cohesive. The results proved not only the original premise, but also that participants viewed cohesive groups as having particularly high group mind.

Given that group mind has critical implications for judgments of responsibility, the second experiment tested the consequences of assigning group mind by rating the extent to which groups are morally responsible for their collective actions, and the extent to which each group member is responsible for the collective actions of the group. As a result, when participants assigned a single mind to a group, they also assigned responsibility for that group's collective actions to the group's body of members.

The third experiment then tested the effect of perceived cohesiveness on assignment of group mind and responsibility, and found that groups perceived to be cohesive were assigned higher levels of both, and assigned low levels of individual minds within the group.

In the final experiment, Young and Waytz found that members of cohesive groups were not assigned individual responsibility for individual actions.

"In ongoing research, we are looking at intergroup conflict," said Young."For example, how do Republicans and Democrats actually think about the opposing party versus membersof the opposing party?"

The study, "The Group-Member Mind Tradeoff: Attributing Mind to Groups Versus Group Members," appears in the December 2011 issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Boston College. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

Boston College. "How people assign blame: Cohesive groups hold members less responsible for individual actions." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 8 December 2011. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111208121400.htm>.
Boston College. (2011, December 8). How people assign blame: Cohesive groups hold members less responsible for individual actions. ScienceDaily. Retrieved October 31, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111208121400.htm
Boston College. "How people assign blame: Cohesive groups hold members less responsible for individual actions." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111208121400.htm (accessed October 31, 2014).

Share This



More Science & Society News

Friday, October 31, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

EU, Russia, Ukraine Seal Breakthrough Gas Accord

EU, Russia, Ukraine Seal Breakthrough Gas Accord

AFP (Oct. 31, 2014) Russia agrees to resume gas deliveries to war-torn Ukraine through the winter in an EU-brokered, multi-billion dollar deal signed by the three parties in Brussels. Duration: 01:10 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Alcoholic Drinks In The E.U. Could Get Calorie Labels

Alcoholic Drinks In The E.U. Could Get Calorie Labels

Newsy (Oct. 31, 2014) A health group in the United Kingdom has called for mandatory calorie labels on alcoholic beverages in the European Union. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Relief After “gas War” Is Averted

Relief After “gas War” Is Averted

Reuters - Business Video Online (Oct. 31, 2014) A gas war between Russia and Ukraine has been averted. But as Hayley Platt reports a deal was only reached after Kiev's western creditors agreed to partly funding the deal. Video provided by Reuters
Powered by NewsLook.com
Malaria Threat in Liberia as Fight Against Ebola Rages

Malaria Threat in Liberia as Fight Against Ebola Rages

AFP (Oct. 31, 2014) Focus on treating the Ebola epidemic in Liberia means that treatment for malaria, itself a killer, is hard to come by. MSF are now undertaking the mass distribution of antimalarials in Monrovia. Duration: 00:38 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:

Strange & Offbeat Stories


Science & Society

Business & Industry

Education & Learning

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins