Science News
from research organizations

Study shows 'readability' scores largely inaccurate

Date:
January 8, 2014
Source:
North Carolina State University
Summary:
Teachers, parents and textbook companies use technical "readability" formulas to determine how difficult reading materials are and to set reading levels by age group. But new research shows that the readability formulas are usually inaccurate and offer little insight into which age groups will be able to read and understand a text.
Share:
       
FULL STORY

Teachers, parents and textbook companies use technical "readability" formulas to determine how difficult reading materials are and to set reading levels by age group. But new research from North Carolina State University shows that the readability formulas are usually inaccurate and offer little insight into which age groups will be able to read and understand a text.

"Teachers often use readability levels when giving reading assignments to students," says Dr. John Begeny, an associate professor of psychology at NC State and lead author of a paper describing the work. "We wanted to know if the readability formulas are valid, or if teachers who think they're assigning a simpler book to struggling readers, for example, may actually be assigning a more difficult one."

For the study, researchers had 360 students -- ranging from second to fifth grade -- read six written passages out loud. The researchers assessed the students' performance, giving each student an "oral reading fluency" score, which is considered a good metric for measuring reading ability.

The researchers then used eight different readability formulas to see which level each formula gave to the six written passages. Results varied widely, with one passage being rated from first grade to fifth grade level.

The levels assigned by the readability formulas were then compared with researchers' assessments of each student's actual ability to read the material. Seven of the eight readability formulas were less than 49 percent accurate, with the worst formula scoring only 17 percent accuracy. The highest-rated formula was accurate 79 percent of the time.

"Overall, this work shows that teachers and parents should be very cautious about using readability levels when giving reading assignments to students," Begeny says.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by North Carolina State University. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. John C. Begeny, Diana J. Greene. CAN READABILITY FORMULAS BE USED TO SUCCESSFULLY GAUGE DIFFICULTY OF READING MATERIALS? Psychology in the Schools, 2013; DOI: 10.1002/pits.21740

Cite This Page:

North Carolina State University. "Study shows 'readability' scores largely inaccurate." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 8 January 2014. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140108102449.htm>.
North Carolina State University. (2014, January 8). Study shows 'readability' scores largely inaccurate. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 26, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140108102449.htm
North Carolina State University. "Study shows 'readability' scores largely inaccurate." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140108102449.htm (accessed May 26, 2015).

Share This Page: