Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Is it moral to laugh when innocent people die? Psychological 'sacrificial dilemma' experiments may have outlived their usefulness

Date:
July 2, 2014
Source:
University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Summary:
A runaway trolley is out of control. Ahead of it on the tracks are five people tied up and unable to move. You are too far away to untie the people, but if you act quickly, you could push a very large man in front of the trolley and stop its progress. Do you do nothing and let five people die, or kill the large stranger? For the past few decades, many psychologists and other behavioral scientists have used this scenario, known as the trolley problem, to shed light on how people make moral decisions in their everyday lives. A new study finds decades-old psychological “sacrificial dilemma” experiments may have outlived their usefulness.

A runaway trolley is out of control. Ahead of it on the tracks are five people tied up and unable to move. You are too far away to untie the people, but if you act quickly, you could push a very large man in front of the trolley and stop its progress. Do you do nothing and let five people die, or kill the large stranger?

For the past few decades, many psychologists and other behavioral scientists have used this scenario, known as the trolley problem, to shed light on how people make moral decisions in their everyday lives. Experiments involving the trolley problem and similar "sacrificial dilemmas" are now the bedrock of some major theories of morality that have been featured in scores of academic papers, college textbooks, and popular media outlets.

But a new paper by University of Chicago Booth School of Business Professor Daniel M. Bartels explains that these scenarios may have outlived their usefulness and provide a distorted view of morality.

In "Concerns About Trolley Problems and Other Sacrificial Dilemmas in Moral Psychology," to be published in an upcoming issue of Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Bartels, together with Christopher W. Bauman of the University of California, Irvine; Peter McGraw of the University of Colorado Boulder; and Caleb Warren of Texas A&M University, point out three primary elements of trolley problems that render them questionable tools for examining how people make moral choices.

The paper was derived from a conversation that the authors started during a meeting of the Moral Research Lab, which is co-directed by Bartels and McGraw.

"Sacrificial dilemmas are really engaging situations that people enjoy thinking about," Bartels says. "But when people are actually faced with real moral dilemmas, they rarely view them as a lark. So we are concerned that studying these situations may only provide a partial view of how people confront moral problems in their everyday lives."

First, because such situations are often amusing, rather than sobering, subjects disengage. Rather than feel that something important is at stake, they look forward to mulling over responses and making an argument one way or the other.

Second, the situations are so unrealistic and so unlikely to happen that they don't reflect real life. Few people will ever have to make snap decisions in unfamiliar situations that pose such stark choices, as in the trolley problem. The artificiality of the situation affects the way people respond, so it would make more sense to study more realistic situations, such as when engineers evaluate risk thresholds for product safety, managers evaluate cost structures and consider employee layoffs, and medical professionals allocate scarce or expensive medical resources.

Finally, the trolley problem does not engage the same psychological processes as true moral situations. For example, real-life moral problems ignite passions and divide those who disagree, but these responses are wholly missing from people's reactions to sacrificial dilemmas.

"We are not saying that all moral dilemmas and scenarios should be done away with," Bartels adds. "We think they are important for understanding how people reason, make choices and behave. But we think that adding more realistic scenarios to the mix is essential to advancing the science of morality."


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

University of Chicago Booth School of Business. "Is it moral to laugh when innocent people die? Psychological 'sacrificial dilemma' experiments may have outlived their usefulness." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 2 July 2014. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140702165936.htm>.
University of Chicago Booth School of Business. (2014, July 2). Is it moral to laugh when innocent people die? Psychological 'sacrificial dilemma' experiments may have outlived their usefulness. ScienceDaily. Retrieved September 2, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140702165936.htm
University of Chicago Booth School of Business. "Is it moral to laugh when innocent people die? Psychological 'sacrificial dilemma' experiments may have outlived their usefulness." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140702165936.htm (accessed September 2, 2014).

Share This




More Mind & Brain News

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Can You Train Your Brain To Eat Healthy?

Can You Train Your Brain To Eat Healthy?

Newsy (Sep. 1, 2014) New research says if you condition yourself to eat healthy foods, eventually you'll crave them instead of junk food. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Coffee Then Napping: The (New) Key To Alertness

Coffee Then Napping: The (New) Key To Alertness

Newsy (Aug. 30, 2014) Researchers say having a cup of coffee then taking a nap is more effective than a nap or coffee alone. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Young Entrepreneurs Get $100,000, If They Quit School

Young Entrepreneurs Get $100,000, If They Quit School

AFP (Aug. 29, 2014) Twenty college-age students are getting 100,000 dollars from a Silicon Valley leader and a chance to live in San Francisco in order to work on the start-up project of their dreams, but they have to quit school first. Duration: 02:20 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Baby Babbling Might Lead To Faster Language Development

Baby Babbling Might Lead To Faster Language Development

Newsy (Aug. 29, 2014) A new study suggests babies develop language skills more quickly if their parents imitate the babies' sounds and expressions and talk to them often. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins