ScienceDaily (Aug. 20, 2009) — A study by researchers at the University of Leicester has revealed new ways to spot whether medical research has hidden biases.

Writing in the British Medical Journal, Santiago Moreno and his colleagues demonstrate how to spot 'publication bias' in the reporting of clinical trials which potentially form the basis of Government and NHS health policies. They also show what mathematical adjustments can be made to remove such unintended distortion of data.

Health policies are founded on 'clinical trials': experiments done in a laboratory or with groups of patients, which produce statistical results (because no two individuals are alike). Experimental results are published in medical journals after being thoroughly checked to ensure that all the methods used were fair and accurate – but 'publication bias' can affect what gets published.

For example, trials with negative results – showing that a treatment doesn't work – may be less likely to be published than those showing that it does. And this can create a distorted view of the treatment's effectiveness when policy-makers have to decide on whether it is worthwhile.

The University of Leicester researchers- examined two new methods of statistical analysis, using data on anti-depressant use available from the United States' Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA's data is considered 'gold standard' – free from bias – so it can be used to check whether statistics collected from journals, when adjusted, provide a true picture.

Both methods investigated by the Leicester team proved effective in identifying and eliminating publication bias from medical research.

Santiago's colleagues in the research project were Professor Alex Sutton, Professor Keith Abrams and Dr Nicola Cooper, from the Department of Health Sciences, plus collaborators at the Universities of Bristol and Oregon.

Story Source:

Adapted from materials provided by University of Leicester, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Related Stories

New Biosensor For Most Serious Form Of Listeria Food Poisoning Bacteria (May 1, 2009) — Scientists in Indiana are reporting development of a new biosensor for use in a faster, more sensitive test for detecting the deadliest strain of Listeria food poisoning bacteria. That microbe causes ...  > read more

Half Of Trials Supporting FDA Applications Go Unpublished (Sep. 22, 2008) — Over half of all supporting trials for FDA-approved drugs remained unpublished 5 years after approval, says new research published in PLoS Medicine. The most important trials determining efficacy, ...  > read more

Some Discrepancies Exist Between Outcomes Indicated In Trial Registration And Later Publications (Sep. 2, 2009) — Comparison of the primary outcomes of registered clinical trials with their subsequent publication appears to show some discrepancies, according to a new ...  > read more

Better Test To Detect DNA For Diagnosing Disease, Investigating Crimes (Sep. 3, 2009) — Researchers are reporting development of a new electronic sensor that shows promise as a faster, less expensive, and more practical alternative than tests now used to detect DNA. Such tests are done ...  > read more

Search ScienceDaily

HDTV for Colonoscopies