New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Believers' inferences about God's beliefs are uniquely egocentric

Date:
December 1, 2009
Source:
University of Chicago
Summary:
Religious people tend to use their own beliefs as a guide in thinking about what God believes, but are less constrained when reasoning about other people's beliefs, according to a new study.
Share:
FULL STORY

Religious people tend to use their own beliefs as a guide in thinking about what God believes, but are less constrained when reasoning about other people's beliefs, according to new study published in the Nov. 30 early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Nicholas Epley, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, led the research, which included a series of survey and neuroimaging studies to examine the extent to which people's own beliefs guide their predictions about God's beliefs. The findings of Epley and his co-authors at Australia's Monash University and UChicago extend existing work in psychology showing that people are often egocentric when they infer other people's beliefs.

The PNAS paper reports the results of seven separate studies. The first four include surveys of Boston rail commuters, UChicago undergraduate students and a nationally representative database of online respondents in the United States. In these surveys, participants reported their own belief about an issue, their estimated God's belief, along with a variety of others, including Microsoft founder Bill Gates, Major League Baseball's Barry Bonds, President George W. Bush, and an average American.

Two other studies directly manipulated people's own beliefs and found that inferences about God's beliefs tracked their own beliefs. Study participants were asked, for example, to write and deliver a speech that supported or opposed the death penalty in front of a video camera. Their beliefs were surveyed both before and after the speech.

The final study involved functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure the neural activity of test subjects as they reasoned about their own beliefs versus those of God or another person. The data demonstrated that reasoning about God's beliefs activated many of the same regions that become active when people reasoned about their own beliefs.

The researchers noted that people often set their moral compasses according to what they presume to be God's standards. "The central feature of a compass, however, is that it points north no matter what direction a person is facing," they conclude. "This research suggests that, unlike an actual compass, inferences about God's beliefs may instead point people further in whatever direction they are already facing."

But the research in no way denies the possibility that God's presumed beliefs also may provide guidance in situations where people are uncertain of their own beliefs, the co-authors noted.

Funding was provided by the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, the Templeton Foundation, and the National Science Foundation.


Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Chicago. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Nicholas Epley, Benjamin A. Converse, Alexa Delbosc, George A. Monteleone and John T. Cacioppo. Believers' estimates of God's beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people's beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nov. 30, 2009

Cite This Page:

University of Chicago. "Believers' inferences about God's beliefs are uniquely egocentric." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 1 December 2009. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091130151321.htm>.
University of Chicago. (2009, December 1). Believers' inferences about God's beliefs are uniquely egocentric. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 28, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091130151321.htm
University of Chicago. "Believers' inferences about God's beliefs are uniquely egocentric." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091130151321.htm (accessed March 28, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES