Science News
from research organizations

Altitude training: Study puts some data behind conventional wisdom

Date:
June 1, 2012
Source:
Indiana University
Summary:
With altitude training, coaches of elite runners generally fall into two camps when determining when their runners should compete after coming back from altitude, even though little research has been conducted on this question. A study by exercise physiologists finds that both camps might be right.
Share:
       
FULL STORY

Altitude training is a popular technique among athletes preparing for a competition, especially expert runners. Much research has been conducted on how to do it, at what altitude to train, how to modify workouts and how long to stay at altitude. However, a major unanswered question is when should an athlete return from altitude to compete?

Coaches of elite runners generally take one of two sides.

"They either believe an athlete should compete within 48 hours of coming back from altitude or in the 18- to 22-day range after returning," said Robert Chapman, exercise physiologist in the School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation at Indiana University Bloomington. "But there is little scientific evidence showing why these coaches' opinions are valid."

His study, which was discussed at the American College of Sports Medicine annual meeting on May 31 suggests that both camps might be right.

About the study:

  • Six elite distance runners lived in Flagstaff, Ariz., for 28 days at an altitude of 2,150 meters. They followed a "live high, train low" altitude training program, which means that although the athletes lived at a high altitude, they trained at 1,000 meters to do harder and faster workouts a few times per week. After returning from the 28-day camp, the runners were tested over the course of 26 days. Researchers focused on testing heart rate, running economy and mechanics.
  • Physiological data shows that what most coaches say is true. Several variables showed that 48 hours is a good time to compete based on breathing results, while Day 7 and 13 showed more difficulty.

Chapman said this might be attributed to a concept referred to as ventilatory acclimatization.

"At altitude, a person breathes more, and that extra breathing stays with you when you come back down from altitude. Extra breathing uses more muscles, more energy, and the body has to work more to regulate blood flow," he said.

This study suggests that an athlete may perform best at 18 to 22 days because the extra breathing goes away and the body gets re-acclimated to a lower altitude.

"This research will help athletes plan for major competitions," says lead author Abby Laymon, graduate student in the School of HPER's Department of Kinesiology. "For example, if an athlete is training for the Olympic trials, they can count backwards and plan their workout accordingly to perform their best after altitude training."

This study joins four others from IU that focus on altitude training. Future studies will determine why the physiological changes occur post-altitude.

The study, "Time-course of changes in cardiorespiratory measures post-altitude training: Implications for competitive endurance performance," was discussed May 31 during the High Altitude/Hypoxia I session.

Co-authors are Daniel P. Wilhite, Joseph W. Duke, Jonathon L. Stickford, Joel M. Stager and Timothy D. Mickleborough, all from the School of HPER's Department of Kinesiology.


Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Indiana University. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

Indiana University. "Altitude training: Study puts some data behind conventional wisdom." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 1 June 2012. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120601231551.htm>.
Indiana University. (2012, June 1). Altitude training: Study puts some data behind conventional wisdom. ScienceDaily. Retrieved September 2, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120601231551.htm
Indiana University. "Altitude training: Study puts some data behind conventional wisdom." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120601231551.htm (accessed September 2, 2015).

Share This Page: