Science News
from research organizations

New research questions effectiveness of drones in fight against terrorism and highlights growing opposition to their use

Date:
January 13, 2014
Source:
Taylor & Francis
Summary:
Two new articles explore the use of drones in military operations. The articles highlight increasing levels of disapproval of the use of drones in recent U.S. polls and suggest that drone warfare may be leading to an emphasis on tactical wins over long-term strategic victories.
Share:
       
FULL STORY

Two new papers published in the latest volume of Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict explore the use of drones in military operations. The articles highlight increasing levels of disapproval of the use of drones in recent U.S. polls and suggest that drone warfare may be leading to an emphasis on tactical wins over long-term strategic victories.

Tom McCauley's "U.S. Public Support for Drone Strikes against Asymmetric Enemies Abroad: Poll Trends in 2013" shows that, while a strong majority of U.S. citizens are in favor of using drones against terrorists in foreign lands, a small and increasing minority are against their use. In contrast, majorities in most countries are opposed to U.S. drone attacks against terrorists. McCauley notes, 'Should drones' unpopularity in the United States continue to increase, and their unpopularity in other countries persist, they may well become politically impractical, no matter how convenient and cost-effective the technology may be'.

Metin Gurcan's "Drone Warfare and Contemporary Strategy Making: Does the Tail Wag the Dog?" argues that increasing use of drones in asymmetric conflict is reversing the dominance of strategy over tactics and may be undermining civilian control of the military. Gurcan notes that while there are a number of advantages to using drones, such as effectiveness at removing key targets and avoidance of friendly casualties, they may also increase the power of extremists amongst civilian populations by creating a siege mentality. He notes that breaking the power of extremists does not rest on the killing or capture of high-value targets, rather it depends on 'removing their power to intimidate -- something that drone strikes cannot do'. This article also reveals that concerns about military drones are salient not just for civilians, but even for army officers such as Gurcan.

The use of drones in U.S. military operations has increased rapidly in the last decade, with the US annual budget for drones growing from $1.9 billion in 2006 to $5.1 billion in 2011. This development has sparked considerable debate in countries that operate drones and in populaces living with them, and has resulted in a backlash in some audiences. The two papers published in DAC raise issues about military use of drones that will likely grow in years to come.


Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Taylor & Francis. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal References:

  1. Tom McCauley. US public support for drone strikes against asymmetric enemies abroad: Poll trends in 2013. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 2013; 6 (1-3): 90 DOI: 10.1080/17467586.2013.861603
  2. Metin Gurcan. Drone warfare and contemporary strategy making: Does the tail wag the dog? Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 2013; 6 (1-3): 153 DOI: 10.1080/17467586.2013.859284

Cite This Page:

Taylor & Francis. "New research questions effectiveness of drones in fight against terrorism and highlights growing opposition to their use." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 13 January 2014. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140113100531.htm>.
Taylor & Francis. (2014, January 13). New research questions effectiveness of drones in fight against terrorism and highlights growing opposition to their use. ScienceDaily. Retrieved August 30, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140113100531.htm
Taylor & Francis. "New research questions effectiveness of drones in fight against terrorism and highlights growing opposition to their use." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140113100531.htm (accessed August 30, 2015).

Share This Page: