Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Public reporting of ICU mortality does not improve outcomes

Date:
May 19, 2014
Source:
American Thoracic Society
Summary:
A large study of intensive care patients found that public reporting of patient outcomes did not reduce mortality, but did result in reduced admission of the sickest patients to the ICU and increased transfer of critically ill patients to other hospitals. "Public reporting is designed to reduce mortality by steering patients towards high-quality hospitals and creating incentives for hospitals to adopt quality improvement programs," said one expert. "But the reality does not necessarily meet the expectation."

A large study of intensive care patients in California found that public reporting of patient outcomes did not reduce mortality, but did result in reduced admission of the sickest patients to the ICU and increased transfer of critically ill patients to other hospitals.

Related Articles


"Public reporting is designed to reduce mortality by steering patients towards high-quality hospitals and creating incentives for hospitals to adopt quality improvement programs," said Lora Reineck, MD, a postdoctoral scholar at the University of Pittsburgh. "But the reality does not necessarily meet the expectation."

In fact, said Reineck, the study demonstrated that large policy initiatives like California's can have unintended consequences. Whether those consequences left patients worse or better off is not a question the study was designed to answer.

"It could be that some hospitals didn't take certain surgical cases, fearing that the patients were at high risk of dying in intensive care after surgery," Dr. Reineck explained. "Or, it could be that the very sickest patients were not admitted to the ICU because they were not going to get better, and instead were transitioned to care that emphasized comfort rather than prolonging life."

In their retrospective cohort study, presented at the 2014 American Thoracic Society International Conference, Reineck and Pitt colleagues took advantage of a natural experiment created in 2007 when California required every ICU in the state to report severity-adjusted mortality rates. (California has since stopped collecting and reporting this information, and no other state has launched a similar initiative.)

As a control, the Pitt researchers looked at Arizona, Nevada, and Texas, which did not have a public report requirement. In all four states, the group gathered Medicare fee-for-service data from 2005 to 2009, two years before California initiated its program and continuing two years after the program was launched.

In all, they reviewed the records of 936,063 patients admitted to 646 hospitals. To determine the effect of public reporting, they compared changes over time in California ICUs to control ICUs. The researchers analyzed admission patterns in each ICU by determining the proportion of patients with 3 or greater comorbidities and the proportion of patients needing mechanical ventilation in each ICU. They reviewed discharge patterns by examining where ICU patients were sent when they left the hospital. And they assessed mortality rates, including deaths that occurred in the hospital and those that occurred within 30 days of hospital admission.

In their analysis, the team adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics, as well as regional characteristics that could affect patient outcomes. These regional factors included the age and racial distribution of residents and the number of hospitals in the region, a statistic that could affect how often critically ill patients were transferred to another ICU. In the first year after public reporting began, California ICUs experienced virtually identical changes in in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates as controls (OR 1, p=0. 97; OR 1, p=0 .84, respectively).

However, in the first year, both the admission and discharge patterns showed statistically significant changes. Patients with 3 or more comorbidities were less likely to be admitted to California ICUs than control ICUs (OR .98, p=0.03). They were also more likely to be transferred to another acute care facility (OR 1.08, p=0.03).

In the second year of pubic reporting, these patterns continued. Changes in mortality rates in California were similar to controls (in-hospital mortality OR 0.99, p = 0.72; 30-day mortality OR 0.99, p = 0.55). Admission of patients with 3 or more comorbidities was reduced compared to controls, but this was not statistically significant (OR 0.98, p=0. 13). And critically ill patients were more likely to be transferred to another hospital than in control states -- a pattern more pronounced in year two than in year one (OR 1.43, p<0.001).

The Pitt researchers also looked at the number of patients who were transitioned to skilled nursing homes or long-term care facilities. They hypothesized that hospitals would try to improve their mortality rates by sending patients to these facilities.

"We expected that the proportion of patients discharged to these post-acute care facilities would have increased, but it didn't," Reineck said.

Reineck noted that a similar, but much smaller, study conducted in Cleveland, OH, supported their original hypothesis. The study, which analyzed the effect of publicly reporting ICU in-hospital mortality rates during the 1990s, found that discharges to post-acute care facilities increased while in-hospital mortality decreased. (Sirio CA, Shepardson LB, Rotondi AJ, et al. Community-wide assessment of intensive care outcomes using a physiologically based prognostic measure: implications for critical care delivery from Cleveland Health Quality Choice. Chest 1999; 115:793-801.) Reineck also noted that initial media stories in California erroneously credited public reporting of ICU mortality rates with reducing mortality.

"That turned out not to be true," she said. "We determined that mortality rates decreased in the control states at the same rate as California, meaning that the quality of care of all ICU patients improved during the study period irrespective of the public reporting initiative in California."


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by American Thoracic Society. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

American Thoracic Society. "Public reporting of ICU mortality does not improve outcomes." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 19 May 2014. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140519184544.htm>.
American Thoracic Society. (2014, May 19). Public reporting of ICU mortality does not improve outcomes. ScienceDaily. Retrieved November 28, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140519184544.htm
American Thoracic Society. "Public reporting of ICU mortality does not improve outcomes." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/05/140519184544.htm (accessed November 28, 2014).

Share This


More From ScienceDaily



More Health & Medicine News

Friday, November 28, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Rural India's Low-Cost Sanitary Pad Revolution

Rural India's Low-Cost Sanitary Pad Revolution

AFP (Nov. 28, 2014) — One man hopes his invention -– a machine that produces cheap sanitary pads –- will help empower Indian women. Duration: 01:51 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Research on Bats Could Help Develop Drugs Against Ebola

Research on Bats Could Help Develop Drugs Against Ebola

AFP (Nov. 28, 2014) — In Africa's only biosafety level 4 laboratory, scientists have been carrying out experiments on bats to understand how virus like Ebola are being transmitted, and how some of them resist to it. Duration: 01:18 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com
WHO Says Male Ebola Survivors Should Abstain From Sex

WHO Says Male Ebola Survivors Should Abstain From Sex

Newsy (Nov. 28, 2014) — WHO cites four studies that say Ebola can still be detected in semen up to 82 days after the onset of symptoms. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Ebola Leaves Orphans Alone in Sierra Leone

Ebola Leaves Orphans Alone in Sierra Leone

AFP (Nov. 27, 2014) — The Ebola epidemic sweeping Sierra Leone is having a profound effect on the country's children, many of whom have been left without any family members to support them. Duration: 01:02 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:  

Breaking News:

Strange & Offbeat Stories

 

Health & Medicine

Mind & Brain

Living & Well

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:  

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile iPhone Android Web
Follow Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins