The Internet has revolutionized the software industry. A single software market is emerging, independent of national borders, where products and services are digitally distributed. But the legal framework for software transfers is not geographically independent; relevant underlying law varies substantially between different legal systems. A new dissertation in legal science from Umeĺ University, Sweden, demonstrates the legal difficulties with this emerging market, but also proposes solutions to such problems.
The legal scholar Jan Leidö has examined cross-national validity of certain standard software license agreements under American and German law. The United States and the European Union collectively dominate the single software market. Within the EU, Germany is the most relevant legal system, and many conclusions reached under German law can be extended to the entire EU. Due to the importance of these markets, cross-national validity under American and German law is of major importance for all software companies acting within this emerging market.
"Software companies and users are drawn to this emerging market and its new possibilities. But this market creates new and difficult legal requirements for the parties," says Jan Leidö.
The study identifies many current issues, caused by inter alia inherent limits of law, such as the dissolution of geographical boundaries leading to legal rules with unclear legal scope, rapid technical and business development, as well as the legal complexity in this area of law. Other current issues are caused by fundamental differences between German and American law in relevant aspects, from basic questions to more detailed questions. A third category of issues is caused by problematic legal, technical, and business-related choices made by transferors. This currently leads to a number of legal problems with formation, substantive content, and interpretation of software license agreements on a cross-national level. As a result, this causes increasing legal and practical problems for the industry and individual transferors.
"The industry and individual software companies need to start thinking about how legally to handle this emerging market and legally to secure their future," says Jan Leidö.
Improving cross-national validity is becoming increasingly important for a number of reasons, such as active litigation in the field, especially between commercial companies, as well as increasing external pressure to improve cross-national validity. Such external pressure comes inter alia from lawmakers and consumer organizations in different countries, legal mechanisms and institutions in different countries that effectively require legal compliance, as well as market reactions to problematic software license agreements. The need to improve cross-national validity will likely increase further when transferors and transferees in developing countries become increasingly active within the single market, making the legal framework increasingly diversified. Improved cross-national validity will improve legal certainty for the industry and individual transferors, which by extension will also improve the legal position of transferees.
To improve cross-national validity and realize the single software market, Jan Leidö's dissertation gives major and minor suggestions to improve software license agreements and business models. With relatively simple means it is possible to improve the validity of software license agreement formation and modification. Through more substantial improvements it is possible to improve cross-national validity of the substantive content of software license agreements and avoid cross-national problems with interpretation. To simplify matters, the thesis gives different solutions and suggestions adapted to different business models and technical solutions.
Link to the full dissertation: http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:716948
Cite This Page: