Save
Email
Print
ShareJuly 24, 1998 — BERKELEY, Calif. -- A team of theorists at the Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, whose calculations motivated the successful synthesis of materials based on carbon-36 fullerenes, has calculated that these systems may lose all electrical resistance at temperatures far higher than any other carbon structure -- perhaps even at temperatures in the range that superconducting copper-oxide ceramics have achieved.
"The highest-temperature superconductor is the home run that everybody is trying to hit," says Marvin Cohen, who with Steven G. Louie heads a theory group in Berkeley Lab's Material Sciences Division (MSD); both are professors of physics at the University of California at Berkeley. "Even if the carbon-36 materials don't achieve this, they give us a new class of solids to help develop our knowledge about this field."
Cohen says, "If you intercalate potassium atoms among the planes of graphite, even graphite becomes superconducting -- but at half a degree Kelvin," an inconveniently low temperature. "On the other hand, C-60 'buckyballs' doped with alkali metals can be superconductors at up to 40 K. Part of the explanation seems to be the curvature of the ball."
A closed carbon structure with more overall curvature than C-60 is expected to have fewer atoms; while fullerenes smaller than C-60 have been observed, experimenters Charles Piskoti, Alex Zettl, and Jeff Yarger of UC Berkeley, who are also with Berkeley Lab's MSD, were the first to extract an appreciable amount of C-36, having been encouraged by the Cohen-Louie group's theoretical calculations. The Zettl group announced the isolation of bulk samples of C-36 in Nature on 25 June, 1998.
Graduate student Michel Côté and postdoctoral fellow Jeffrey C. Grossman of the Cohen-Louie group emphasize the value of their close working relationship with Zettl's experimental group. "The cross fertilization has helped us all," says Grossman.
Long ago, the 18th century mathematician Leonhard Euler established that every closed polygon made with hexagons and pentagons must contain exactly 12 pentagons. C-60's soccer-ball shape is the smallest possible structure in which the 12 do not touch; in any smaller structure, the pentagons must touch.
Indeed, the likeliest structure incorporating 36 carbon atoms consists of two "bowls," each a hexagon surrounded by six pentagons; each bowl has 18 vertices where atoms sit. The two pentagon-sided bowls face each other, forming an equatorial belt of six more hexagons.
The resulting structure has so-called D6h symmetry, meaning that if it is rotated around its long axis, it looks the same after each sixth of a turn, and if it is sliced through the equator, its top and bottom are identical. A carbon atom in the D6h structure may have one of three different bonding configurations, depending on its relation to its neighbors. Thus C-36 has what Grossman calls "three unique atoms."
Côté says, "The strain on the bonds among atoms influences electron-phonon coupling, and according to BCS theory" -- advanced in 1957 by John Bardeen, Leon Cooper, and Robert Schriefer to explain superconductivity in terms of the motion of electron pairs -- "electron-phonon coupling is a mechanism that makes superconductivity possible."
Phonons are a way of representing atomic vibrations in a solid; oscillations in interatomic charge can make it possible for electrons to move as pairs. Strained or "bent" bonds between carbon atoms in fullerenes may expose electron orbitals normally unaffected by the vibrational modes in flat graphite. The more electron orbitals the atomic vibrations can affect, the greater the potential for electron-phonon coupling and the greater the prospects for superconductivity.
Carbon atoms at the vertices of a pentagon are under more strain than those at the vertices of a hexagon. Moreover, "clustering of pentagons creates severely strained atomic sites," says Côté. Every atom in the D6h structure is at the vertex of one or two pentagons.
Although Côté and Grossman did their calculations on individual molecules first, "which electrons couple depends on how the molecules form a solid," Grossman says. If the D6h fullerenes are arranged in a repeating crystal lattice, two close-packed arrangements are possible: the hexagonal, in which each molecule sits directly over another, and the rhombohedral, in which each molecule perches midway between the molecules below it.
Working with colleagues at Berkeley Lab's National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, Côté and Grossman used the pseudopotential method pioneered by Marvin Cohen in calculating the electronic densities and other properties of the two crystals. They calculated that the rhombohedral crystal would be metallic and that the hexagonal crystal, which is slightly favored energetically, would be an insulator. A striking difference between C-36 crystals and those of C-60 is that C-36 molecules are covalently bonded -- much more tightly bound than buckyballs in a crystal.
Côté and Grossman estimated the electron-phonon coupling for these solids and -- by making the plausible assumption that certain factors are the same as for C-60 -- found that the temperature at which solid C-36 becomes superconducting could be as much as three times higher. Not room temperature, exactly -- but plenty hot enough to encourage further investigation of this new material.
"However," says Grossman, "the superconducting temperature depends on other factors besides the electron-phonon coupling, so it's hard to make quantitative predictions from theory."
While preliminary results indicate the possibility of raising the superconducting temperature of C-36 above the boiling point of nitrogen, 77 degrees Kelvin, whether it can be raised even higher -- above that of the present record-holder, which at ambient pressure becomes superconducting at 135 degrees Kelvin -- is uncertain.
To resolve these uncertainties, Côté and Grossman are extending and continuing their calculations. In the meantime, they emphasize the implications of their latest theoretical work for the progress of materials science.
"We're no longer saying, 'here's A model of something you may never see'," says Grossman. "Because of increased computing power and highly developed algorithms, we can now construct realistic physical models and then make predictions from first principles about real materials which can be made."
"We were able to tell the experimenters in advance that a C-36 cystal should form," Côté adds, "and by specifying different properties, we could help them decide which form they had made."
Côté, Grossman, Cohen, and Louie discuss their investigation of electron-phonon interactions in solid C-36 in Physical Review Letters, July 20, 1998, and the structure and properties of molecular C-36 in Chemical Physics Letters, March 6, 1998.
The Berkeley Lab is a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory located in Berkeley, California. It conducts unclassified scientific research and is managed by the University of California.
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:
Story Source:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
more 
