ScienceDaily (Jan. 15, 2009) — University of Toronto quantum physicists Jeff Lundeen and Aephraim Steinberg have shown that Hardy's paradox, a proposal that has confounded physicists for over a decade, can be confirmed and ultimately resolved, a task which had seemingly been impossible to perform.

"For nearly a century, the widespread interpretation of quantum mechanics suggests that everything is uncertain until it is observed, and that observation inevitably alters reality," says Professor Steinberg. "However, in the 1990s, a technique known as 'interaction-free measurement' seemed to promise the ability to 'see without looking,' as a Scientific American article put it at the time. But when Lucien Hardy proposed that one could never reliably make inferences about past events which hadn't been directly observed, a paradox emerged which suggested that whenever one attempted to reason about the past in this way they would be led into error."

Over the course of nearly two years of work, Steinberg and then-student Jeff Lundeen, now a research associate at the National Research Council of Canada, built a complicated quantum optical experiment and developed new theoretical tools. In essence, they combined Hardy's Paradox with a new theory known as weak measurement proposed by Tel Aviv University physicist Yakir Aharonov, showing that in one sense, one can indeed talk about the past, resolving the paradox. Weak measurement is a tool whereby the presence of a detector is less than the level of uncertainty around what is being measured, so that there is an imperceptible impact on the experiment. "We found that all of the seemingly paradoxical conclusions in Hardy's Paradox can, in fact, be experimentally verified," says Steinberg, "but that the use of weak measurement removes the contradiction."

"Until recently, it seemed impossible to carry out Hardy's proposal in practice, let alone to confirm or resolve the paradox," he says. "We have finally been able to do so, and to apply Aharonov's methods to the problem, showing that there is a way, even in quantum mechanics, in which one can quite consistently discuss past events even after they are over and done. Weak measurement finds what is there without disturbing it."

The research was funded with support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Quantum Works, the Canadian Institute for Photonic Innovations, and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research.

Journal reference:

1. J.S. Lundeen and A.M. Steinberg. Experimental Joint Weak Measurement on a Photon Pair as a Probe of Hardy’s Paradox. Physical Review Letters, 2009; 102 (2): 020404 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.020404

Related Stories

'Spooky Action At A Distance' Of Quantum Mechanics Directly Observed (Mar. 4, 2009) — In quantum mechanics, a vanguard of physics where science often merges into philosophy, much of our understanding is based on conjecture and probabilities, but a group of researchers in Japan has ...  > read more

Physicists Squeeze Light To Quantum Limit (Jan. 7, 2009) — Physicists have demonstrated a way to squeeze light to the fundamental quantum limit, a finding that has potential applications for high-precision measurement, next generation atomic clocks, novel ...  > read more

Quantum Measurements: Common Sense Is Not Enough, Physicists Show (July 23, 2009) — In comparison to classical physics, quantum physics predicts that the properties of a quantum mechanical system depend on the measurement context, i.e., whether other system measurements are carried ...  > read more

A Hidden Twist In The Black Hole Information Paradox (Mar. 10, 2007) — Professor Sam Braunstein, of the University of York's Department of Computer Science, and Dr Arun Pati, of the Institute of Physics, Sainik School, Bhubaneswar, India, have established that quantum ...  > read more

Theorists Attempt To Determine Whether Particle Physics And String Theory Can Be Reconciled (Sep. 23, 2009) — A new toolkit of equations will help theorists determine whether a promising agreement between particle physics and string theory is fact or ...  > read more

Search ScienceDaily

Fighting Fire with Sound