Science News

Test Predicts Who Will Develop End-stage Renal Disease

ScienceDaily (Apr. 11, 2009) — Measuring kidney function by assessing two different factors—glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary albumin levels—helps determine which patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) will develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD), according to a study appearing in the May 2009 issue of the Journal of the American Society Nephrology (JASN). This combination test could help physicians identify patients at high risk of serious kidney trouble and allow them to intervene at an early stage.

While there is a high prevalence of CKD worldwide, relatively few individuals with the disease develop ESRD, expected to affect 785,000 people in the U.S. by 2020 (current annual cost: $32 billion). Physicians and researchers have looked for ways to identify which patients will progress to ESRD in order to target patients most in need of extensive treatment, and help establish clinical guidelines and public health plans for treating patients with CKD.

Stein Hallan, MD, PhD (St. Olav University Hospital, Norway), and his colleagues recently conducted a study to see if combining two tests commonly used to measure kidney function might help predict ESRD. One test measures an individual's estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR—a measure of the volume of fluid filtered by the kidneys), while the other measures the amount of albumin (the predominant protein in the blood) that is excreted in urine. A high urinary albumin level indicates a rapid rate of kidney disease progression, and a low eGFR indicates an advanced stage of disease.

The researchers analyzed data from 65,589 adults who participated in the population-based Nord-Trøndelag Health (HUNT 2) Study and found 124 individuals who developed ESRD after more than 10 years of follow-up. Combining urinary albumin and eGFRs results identified more than 65% of patients who would develop this condition. Other factors such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, obesity, and cardiovascular disease did not provide any additional information that could be used to predict who would develop ESRD.

"We provide clear evidence… that reduced eGFR should always be complemented by information on urine-albumin to yield optimal prediction of the risk of progression to ESRD," said Dr. Hallan. He added that combining these measurements might also help reduce the number of patients referred to specialists without losing the ability to detect future ESRD cases.

"Future risk scores and classification systems based on these two variables will be a simple and powerful tool for improving our ability to efficiently handle the large group of patients with CKD," the authors wrote.

Study co-authors include Eberhard Ritz (Ruperto Carola University Heidelberg); Stian Lydersen, Solfrid Romundstad, and Kurt Kvenild (Norwegian University of Science and Technology), and Stephan Orth (University of Regensburg).


Journal reference:

  1. Hallan et al. Combining GFR and Albuminuria to Classify CKD Improves Prediction of ESRD. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2008070730
Adapted from materials provided by American Society of Nephrology, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.
Email or share this story:
| More
APA

MLA

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 77,468

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily's archives for related news topics,
the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.
 

Science Video News


Kidney Exchange

Computer Scientists have created an algorithm able to sort through up to 10,000 kidney donor/patient pairs, taking over the mammoth task of. ...  > full story

Breaking News

... from NewsDaily.com

In Other News ...

Copyright Reuters 2008. See Restrictions.

Free Subscriptions

... from ScienceDaily

Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Feedback

... we want to hear from you!

Tell us what you think of the new ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Post this page to your favorite social bookmarking site:
close
Include this item in your blog or web site:
close
Cite this article in your essay, paper, or report:
close
Email this page's link to a friend or colleague:
close