Science News
from research organizations

Coronary CTA a cost-effective alternative to cardiac catheterization for the evaluation of CAD, study suggests

Date:
April 21, 2010
Source:
Thomas Jefferson University
Summary:
Noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a cost-effective alternative to invasive cardiac catheterization in the care of patients who have positive stress test results but a less than 50 percent chance of actually having significant coronary artery disease (CAD) according to a new study.
Share:
       
FULL STORY

According to a study conducted at Thomas Jefferson University (TJU), non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a cost-effective alternative to invasive cardiac catheterization in the care of patients who have positive stress test results but a less than 50 percent chance of actually having significant coronary artery disease (CAD).

The study will be published in the May issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology. CAD is a narrowing of the blood vessels that supply blood and oxygen to the heart. If left untreated, it can lead to a heart attack.

"Patients with positive stress test results but no heart-related symptoms, as well as patients with a positive stress test with atypical chest pain often receive referrals for cardiac catheterization for the evaluation of CAD," said the study's lead author, Ethan J. Halpern, M.D., professor, Department of Radiology at Jefferson Medical College, and director, Cardiac CT at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. "Coronary CTA is an alternative, non-invasive diagnostic imaging test that can be used to effectively triage these patients."

The study compared the false-negative rates, false-positive rates, costs, and radiation exposure of direct referral of patients for cardiac catheterization with the values associated with performing coronary CTA before catheterization.

"At a 50 percent prevalence of CAD, we found that performing coronary CTA before cardiac catheterization results in an average cost saving of $789 per patient with a false-negative rate of 2.5 percent and average additional radiation exposure of 1-2 mSv, which is minimal," said Dr. Halpern.

According to the study results, when a patient with an expected CAD prevalence less than 85 percent is found to have a positive stress test result, coronary CTA is a less expensive alternative to direct performance of cardiac catheterization. Recent studies have demonstrated that diagnostic cardiac catheterization of patients with atypical symptoms will demonstrate significant CAD less than half of the time. If the pretest probability of CAD is low, the coronary CTA findings are more likely to obviate cardiac catheterization and thereby reduce both the cost and effective radiation dose of the workup.

The study's co-authors also from Jefferson are: David C. Levin, M.D., professor, Department of Radiology; and Michael Savage, M.D., associate professor, and David Fischman, M.D., associate professor, both of the Division of Cardiology in the Department of Medicine.


Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Thomas Jefferson University. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

Thomas Jefferson University. "Coronary CTA a cost-effective alternative to cardiac catheterization for the evaluation of CAD, study suggests." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 21 April 2010. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100421162617.htm>.
Thomas Jefferson University. (2010, April 21). Coronary CTA a cost-effective alternative to cardiac catheterization for the evaluation of CAD, study suggests. ScienceDaily. Retrieved August 1, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100421162617.htm
Thomas Jefferson University. "Coronary CTA a cost-effective alternative to cardiac catheterization for the evaluation of CAD, study suggests." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100421162617.htm (accessed August 1, 2015).

Share This Page: