Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Open mouth means closed mind: Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices predicts their votes

Date:
November 5, 2012
Source:
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Summary:
New research shows that U.S. Supreme Court justices use oral argument to convince their fellow justices of their own views of the case under consideration.

In the Supreme Court of the United States, oral argument does matter -- but not in the conventional sense, University of Arkansas research shows. Instead of oral argument serving as a means for parties to convince justices of their position, research shows that justices use it to convince their fellow justices of their own views of the case under consideration.

Related Articles


In "Of Closed Minds and Open Mouths: Indicators of Supreme Court Justice Vote during the 2009 and 2010 Sessions," Christopher Kimmel, an Honors College undergraduate, and political science professors Patrick Stewart and William Schreckhise found that justices more readily interrupt and question counsel for the side with which they disagree.

"The role of oral argument isn't necessarily what we think it is. It's really an opportunity for the justices to get the other justices on their side," said Schreckhise. "This shows that justices come to the bench in individual cases with a pre-set idea of what they think is the right answer and would like to convince the other justices of what they think."

In their research, Stewart, Schreckhise and Kimmel examined whom the justices interrupted during oral argument in 11 significant and highly contested cases before the Supreme Court during its 2009 and 2010 terms. The authors then linked the interruptions to the individual justices' votes on the outcome of the case. They found justices are most likely to interrupt counsel of the side they will vote against. This indicates, the team wrote, that the interruptions are a way for the justices to assert control over the argument being made and the lawyer making the argument. More specifically, justices appeared to use interruptions not to ask questions that help them form their opinions about the case, but to convince the other justices to think the way they want them to think.

The research provides a unique insight into a court that is largely shrouded in secrecy. When the justices discuss cases in the chief justice's conference room, no outsiders are allowed, and as a result, how the justices interact when discussing a case is largely unknown. By analyzing the audio recordings of oral arguments, these researchers provide a better understanding of how this court truly operates.

"The title of the article says it best. When you open your mouth, your mind is usually closed. This is especially true when you are talking about justices of the Supreme Court of the United States," Stewart said.

Kimmel, who has since graduated, was an Honors College student and political science major. Stewart is an assistant professor and Schreckhise is an associate professor, both in the department of political science in the J. William Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences. Their article appears in the July 2012 edition of The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Christopher M. Kimmel, Patrick A. Stewart, William D. Schreckhise. Of Closed Minds and Open Mouths: Indicators of Supreme Court Justice Votes during the 2009 and 2010 Sessions. The Forum, 2012; 10 (2) DOI: 10.1515/1540-8884.1485

Cite This Page:

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. "Open mouth means closed mind: Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices predicts their votes." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 5 November 2012. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121105114512.htm>.
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. (2012, November 5). Open mouth means closed mind: Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices predicts their votes. ScienceDaily. Retrieved November 21, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121105114512.htm
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. "Open mouth means closed mind: Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court justices predicts their votes." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121105114512.htm (accessed November 21, 2014).

Share This


More From ScienceDaily



More Science & Society News

Friday, November 21, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Toyota's Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Green Car Soon Available in the US

Toyota's Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Green Car Soon Available in the US

AFP (Nov. 21, 2014) Toyota presented its hydrogen fuel-cell compact car called "Mirai" to US consumers at the Los Angeles auto show. The car should go on sale in 2015 for around $60.000. It combines stored hydrogen with oxygen to generate its own power. Duration: 01:18 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Ebola: Life Without School in Guinea

Ebola: Life Without School in Guinea

AFP (Nov. 21, 2014) Following the closure of schools and universities in Guinea because of the Ebola virus, students look for temporary work or gather in makeshift classrooms to catch up on their syllabus. Duration: 02:14 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com
NSA Director: China Can Damage US Power Grid

NSA Director: China Can Damage US Power Grid

AP (Nov. 20, 2014) China and "one or two" other countries are capable of mounting cyberattacks that would shut down the electric grid and other critical systems in parts of the United States, according to Adm. Michael Rogers, director of the National Security Agency and hea Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Nations Pledge $9.3 Bn for Green Climate Fund

Nations Pledge $9.3 Bn for Green Climate Fund

AFP (Nov. 20, 2014) Nations meeting in Berlin pledge $9.3 billion (7.4 bn euros) for a climate fund to help poor countries cut emissions and prepare for global warming, just shy of a $10bn target. Duration: 00:46 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:

Strange & Offbeat Stories


Science & Society

Business & Industry

Education & Learning

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins