Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Rethinking investment risk

August 26, 2013
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Does financial innovation inherently lead to greater risk in markets? An economist takes a new look at the problem and says it does.

Does financial innovation inherently lead to greater risk in markets? An MIT economist takes a new look at the problem and says it does.

Related Articles

Financial innovation is supposed to reduce risk -- in theory, at least. Yes, new financial instruments based on the housing market helped cause the financial crisis of 2008. But in the abstract, those same instruments have the potential to spread risk more evenly throughout the marketplace by making it possible to trade debt more extensively, rather than having it concentrated in a relatively few hands.

Now a paper published by MIT economist Alp Simsek makes the case that even in theory, financial innovation does not lower portfolio risk. Instead, it raises portfolio risks by creating situations in which parties sit on opposing sides of deep disagreements about the value of certain investments.

"In a world in which investors have different views, new securities won't necessarily reduce risks," says Simsek, an assistant professor in MIT's Department of Economics. "People bet on their views. And betting is inherently a risk-increasing activity."

In a paper published this month in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, titled "Speculation and Risk Sharing with New Financial Assets," Simsek details why he thinks this is the case. The risk in portfolios, he argues, needs to be divided into two categories: the kind of risk that is simply inherent in any real-world investment, and a second type he calls "speculative variance," which applies precisely to new financial instruments designed to generate bets based on opposing worldviews.

To be clear, Simsek notes, financial innovation may have other benefits -- it may spread information around world markets, for instance -- but it is not going to lead to lower risks for investors as a whole.

"Financial innovation might be good for other reasons, but this general kind of belief that it reduces the risks in the economy is not right," Simsek says. "And I want people to realize that."

We beg to differ

To see why financial innovation is supposed to reduce risk -- and why Simsek argues that it does not -- consider the family of instruments based around home mortgages. These include the mortgage-backed security, which is a bundle of mortgages sold as a bond; the collateralized debt obligation, which is a bundle of mortgage-backed securities; and the credit default swap, which is basically insurance on these kinds of debt.

In theory, wrapping a bunch of mortgages into a bond and selling it on the markets spreads risk around and could lead to lower mortgage rates. Since the bank or lending institution no longer has to hold all the loans, it is both less vulnerable and -- not having to worry as much about defaults -- may be in a better position to loan at lower rates.

Moreover, these kinds of financial instruments separate home loans into distinct tranches, based on apparent risk -- meaning that hedge funds with high risk tolerance could acquire the higher-paying, riskier loans, and pension funds could acquire the seemingly safer tranches.

Any investment in mortgages will contain a certain amount of risk, since no one can be completely certain what the future holds for the housing market. But now consider what occurs when the credit default swap enters the mix. This is essentially a side bet between parties -- such as banks and reinsurance companies -- about the future of the housing market, and it will produce a winner and a loser. The wager represents precisely the kind of speculative variance, in Simsek's term, that stems from a "belief disagreement."

As it happens, Simsek believes that a closer analysis of the standard tool used to evaluate portfolio risk, the capital-asset pricing model (CAPM) in use since the 1960s, reveals that this kind of distinction is inherent in its equations.

"If you do the math, [portfolio risk] naturally breaks down into two components," Simsek says -- the inherent risk of investing, and speculative variance. His current paper is thus a mathematical demonstration of the idea that, using this widely accepted mode of analyzing risk, "as you increase assets, this speculative part always goes up," as he explains, and that "when disagreements are large enough, this second effect is dominant and you end up increasing the average [portfolio risks] as well."

Model research

To be sure, Simsek's conclusion is based on a model. However, modeling is a significant part of economics; the right model can help describe and illuminate complex realities.

"You build models, and if you're lucky enough, the model speaks back," Simsek says.

Moreover, the disastrous results of financial innovations related to the housing market in recent years suggested to him that some rethinking of risk theory was in order. "What happened at the time seemed inconsistent to me with what we learned in finance courses," says Simsek, referring to the investment bubble that sank prominent Wall Street firms and required a huge government bailout.

That is not to say that housing or the bond market are the only areas where speculative variance can be found; as Simsek points out, commodities markets, with their many futures contracts, are an obvious place to find bets based on belief disagreement and expressed through innovative financial tools.

Other economists are impressed by the paper. "He goes deep and he's very careful and rigorous and clear," says Darrell Duffie, a professor of finance at Stanford University's Graduate School of Business, who commented on the paper at this year's meeting of the American Economic Association.

As Duffie notes, there have been many papers published about belief disagreements, and much work done on financial innovation, "but as far as I know this is the only paper that puts the two together." The paper also suggests a need for further empirical research, he says, to test Simsek's theory about belief disagreement and speculative variance.

"It's a pure theory paper, so you often want to have someone come along afterward and measure empirically how big the effect is," Duffie says.

For his part, Simsek says, he would be happy to see empirical research probing his model. It would be beneficial, he thinks, for economists "to engage in a quantitative analysis, asset by asset, to think about the net effect [of speculative variance]. That's a tough question, but one I think we should tackle going forward."

Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The original article was written by Peter Dizikes. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

Journal Reference:

  1. A. Simsek. Speculation and Risk Sharing with New Financial Assets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2013; 128 (3): 1365 DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjt007

Cite This Page:

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Rethinking investment risk." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 26 August 2013. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130826113340.htm>.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2013, August 26). Rethinking investment risk. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 3, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130826113340.htm
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Rethinking investment risk." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130826113340.htm (accessed March 3, 2015).

Share This

More From ScienceDaily

More Science & Society News

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Doctors Often Give In To Vaccine-Wary Parents

Doctors Often Give In To Vaccine-Wary Parents

Newsy (Mar. 2, 2015) A new survey published in the journal Pediatrics found many doctors are giving in to parents&apos; requests to delay vaccinating their children. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Nurse Who Survived Ebola Virus to File Lawsuit

Nurse Who Survived Ebola Virus to File Lawsuit

AP (Mar. 2, 2015) A lawyer for Nina Pham, the 26-year old nurse who survived after contracted the Ebola virus, says the young woman&apos;s &apos;life has changed forever. &apos; Pham is preparing to file a lawsuit against Texas Health Resources for negligence. (March 2) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Mobile World Looks to 5G

Mobile World Looks to 5G

Reuters - Business Video Online (Mar. 2, 2015) The wireless industry&apos;s annual conference gets underway in Barcelona with 85,000 executives taking part and numerous new smartphones and watches being launched. As Ivor Bennett reports from the show the race for 5G is one of the key themes. Video provided by Reuters
Powered by NewsLook.com
Texas Nurse Suing Hospital Where She Contracted Ebola

Texas Nurse Suing Hospital Where She Contracted Ebola

Newsy (Mar. 1, 2015) In an exclusive interview, The Dallas Morning News reports nurse Nina Pham is now suing Texas Health Presbyterian after contracting Ebola. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.


Breaking News:

Strange & Offbeat Stories

Science & Society

Business & Industry

Education & Learning

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News


Free Subscriptions

Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile

Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?

Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins