Science News
from research organizations

Uniform protocols, standards for determining brain death needed

Date:
December 2, 2013
Source:
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN)
Summary:
Process variations related to brain death have far-reaching implications beyond delaying an official declaration of death, including added stress for the patient’s family, missed opportunities for organ donation and increased costs of care, according to an article.
Share:
       
FULL STORY

Process variations related to brain death have far-reaching implications beyond delaying an official declaration of death, including added stress for the patient's family, missed opportunities for organ donation and increased costs of care, according to an article in the December issue of Critical Care Nurse (CCN).

"Brain Death: Assessment, Controversy, and Confounding Factors" urges clear standards and uniform protocols be developed for declaring a patient brain dead. It concludes that aggressive surveillance, patient advocacy and collaboration during all phases of care following severe brain injury are imperative -- and as a primary provider of bedside care, nurses are well positioned as key team members to lead this charge.

The article also calls for timely and optimal clinical assessment, potentially identifying treatment opportunities before a brain injury progresses to a terminal stage. It advocates for consistent standards for determining brain death to facilitate protocol implementation, including uniform intervals for examinations necessary for determination of death due to neurological criteria.

Author Richard B. Arbour, RN, MSN, CCRN, CNRN, CCNS, reviews clinical factors related to brain injury, identifies and illustrates criteria for determining brain death and details confounding factors in brain death. He also discusses the role of bedside nurses and advanced practice nurses in caring for critically ill patients with a life-threatening brain injury.

"Bedside nurses are best positioned to recognize even subtle neurological changes after brain injury," he said. "These subtle changes can identify treatment opportunities to promote the primary goal of patient recovery well before consideration of a brain death protocol.

"Frontline clinicians are also trained to recognize a patient's worsening neurological status and initiate formal, collaborative neurological evaluation for brain death, as clinically appropriate, and remain involved during a brain death protocol," Arbour said.

After a patient is declared brain dead, it is the nurse's role to continue to provide optimal family communications, including addressing potential organ donation.


Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. R. B. Arbour. Brain Death: Assessment, Controversy, and Confounding Factors. Critical Care Nurse, 2013; 33 (6): 27 DOI: 10.4037/ccn2013215

Cite This Page:

American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). "Uniform protocols, standards for determining brain death needed." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 2 December 2013. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131202082316.htm>.
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). (2013, December 2). Uniform protocols, standards for determining brain death needed. ScienceDaily. Retrieved July 2, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131202082316.htm
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). "Uniform protocols, standards for determining brain death needed." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131202082316.htm (accessed July 2, 2015).

Share This Page: