Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: Added benefit for non-pretreated patients not proven

Date:
March 18, 2014
Source:
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
Summary:
In 2012, researchers determined a considerable added benefit for ipilimumab in pretreated patients. However, there were no suitable data for non-pretreated patients. Since the treatment effects presented by the manufacturer were not interpretable, an added benefit of ipilimumab in non-pretreated patients with advanced melanoma is not proven.

The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) already assessed the added benefit of ipilimumab in advanced melanoma in 2012. A considerable added benefit was found for patients who had already received previous treatment. In the new dossier compiled by the drug manufacturer, the drug was now compared with the appropriate comparator therapy dacarbazine specified by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) also for non-pretreated patients.

Again, the manufacturer claimed a noticeable gain in survival time and thus an added benefit. This time, IQWiG did not concur with the interpretation: The effect was estimated on the basis of an indirect comparison of individual patient data. The data were very uncertain and, moreover, by unilaterally excluding patients with particularly unfavourable prognosis, the effect was biased in favour of ipilimumab. Hence an added benefit of ipilimumab in advanced melanoma for non-pretreated patients is not proven.

Approval expanded

Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody used in melanoma if the disease is so advanced that the melanoma can no longer be surgically removed or has formed metastases. In 2012, the manufacturer presented informative data from a randomized controlled trial for pretreated patients. These data indicated a major advantage of ipilimumab in survival time, which was associated with major risk of harm, however.

After the European approval was expanded in 2013 to include patients who have not been treated for their advanced melanoma, the manufacturer now claimed an added benefit versus the appropriate comparator therapy dacarbazine specified by the G-BA also for this group.

Indirect comparison of low quality

However, the manufacturer neither presented a direct comparison nor a so-called adjusted indirect comparison between the study participants who received ipilimumab or the appropriate comparator therapy. Instead, it based its assessment on an indirect comparison of individual patient data from different studies on ipilimumab and on one single study on dacarbazine, from which it chose those patients who had not received previous treatment of advanced melanoma.

It can be assumed in these unadjusted indirect comparisons that patients on both sides of the comparison differ from each other with regards to important confounders, which can entail a systematic bias of the treatment effect. The manufacturer tried to account for these differences with a statistical method.

Results biased in favour of ipilimumab

However, the manufacturer only included those patients in its comparison for whom data on all confounders considered were available. Because of this, considerably more patients were excluded from the comparison on the ipilimumab side than on the dacarbazine side -- e.g. 40% compared to not even 1% in the outcome "overall survival." In the outcome "side effects," the numbers were even further apart. Many patients with particularly poor prognosis were apparently excluded from the analysis on the ipilimumab side. The effects were therefore highly biased in favour of ipilimumab.

Analysis did not consider all confounding variables

Furthermore, the manufacturer did not consider known confounders like the presence of visceral metastases, i.e. metastases in internal organs, or the time since the diagnosis of the melanoma in the analysis presented. The certainty of results, which was already low, was further downgraded because of this.

Since the treatment effects presented by the manufacturer were therefore not interpretable, an added benefit of ipilimumab in non-pretreated patients with advanced melanoma is not proven.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. "Ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: Added benefit for non-pretreated patients not proven." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 18 March 2014. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140318140801.htm>.
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. (2014, March 18). Ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: Added benefit for non-pretreated patients not proven. ScienceDaily. Retrieved October 23, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140318140801.htm
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. "Ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: Added benefit for non-pretreated patients not proven." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140318140801.htm (accessed October 23, 2014).

Share This



More Health & Medicine News

Thursday, October 23, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Orthodontist Mom Jennifer Salzer on the Best Time for Braces

Orthodontist Mom Jennifer Salzer on the Best Time for Braces

Working Mother (Oct. 22, 2014) Is your child ready? Video provided by Working Mother
Powered by NewsLook.com
U.S. Issues Ebola Travel Restrictions, Are Visa Bans Next?

U.S. Issues Ebola Travel Restrictions, Are Visa Bans Next?

Newsy (Oct. 22, 2014) Now that the U.S. is restricting travel from West Africa, some are dropping questions about a travel ban and instead asking about visa bans. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
US to Track Everyone Coming from Ebola Nations

US to Track Everyone Coming from Ebola Nations

AP (Oct. 22, 2014) Stepping up their vigilance against Ebola, federal authorities said Wednesday that everyone traveling into the US from Ebola-stricken nations will be monitored for symptoms for 21 days. (Oct. 22) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Doctors Help Paralysed Man Walk Again, Patient in Disbelief

Doctors Help Paralysed Man Walk Again, Patient in Disbelief

AFP (Oct. 22, 2014) Polish doctors describe how they helped a paralysed man walk again, with the patient in disbelief at the return of sensation to his legs. Duration: 1:04 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:

Strange & Offbeat Stories


Health & Medicine

Mind & Brain

Living & Well

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins