New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Want an expensive engagement ring? Looks count

Men are more likely to buy expensive engagement rings for attractive women, but women expect more expensive rings from unattractive men

Date:
July 10, 2018
Source:
Springer
Summary:
Men are willing to purchase more showy, expensive engagement rings when they imagine themselves with an attractive woman rather than a woman with average looks. Appearance also plays a role for women but, in contrast to men, they are more likely to select an expensive ring with a big stone when they are partnered with a less attractive man.
Share:
FULL STORY

Men are willing to purchase more showy, expensive engagement rings when they imagine themselves with an attractive woman rather than a woman with average looks. Appearance also plays a role for women but, in contrast to men, they are more likely to select an expensive ring with a big stone when they are partnered with a less attractive man. The research, in Springer's journal Evolutionary Psychological Science, was conducted by Jaime Cloud and Madalyn Taylor of Western Oregon University in the US.

Few material goods entail as high a cost and carry as little practical value as an engagement ring. Surprisingly, despite the obvious message attached to this piece of jewelry, very little research is available on what influences people's spending patterns.

In the current experiment, Cloud and Taylor set out to determine whether a person's looks influences the choice or expectations surrounding such purchases. They presented 590 American participants, who were on average 30 years old, with a photograph and some brief information about a member of the opposite sex. Participants had to imagine themselves as the boyfriend or girlfriend of the depicted individual, who was pre-rated to be attractive or unattractive. Women had to choose the smallest ring they were willing to settle for offered by the target man. In turn, the male participants had to indicate the size of ring they would buy for their imaginary girlfriend.

The results support the notion that men are willing to purchase larger, more expensive engagement rings when imagining themselves mated to a more attractive woman. This finding corroborates previous research on mate attraction tactics, which showed that men use symbols of financial success to attract desirable mates.

Women were found to envision larger, more pricey rings for themselves if their imaginary partner was less attractive. This finding provides indirect support for the idea that women are willing to settle for a less handsome partner if his ratings can be upped by another form of compensation, such as being financially better off. The study also found that women who rated themselves as being physically attractive were more likely to go for larger, more expensive rings, regardless of their partner's looks.

"The finding is consistent with the notion that desirable women expect greater resource investment from their mates," adds Taylor.

During the course of the experiment, the participants were also asked about the cost and quality of their own engagement rings. This was done to explore whether the experimental findings would hold true in real life. The researchers were, however, unable to find any consistent pattern.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Springer. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Jaime M. Cloud, Madalyn H. Taylor. The Effect of Mate Value Discrepancy on Hypothetical Engagement Ring Purchases. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2018; DOI: 10.1007/s40806-018-0156-6

Cite This Page:

Springer. "Want an expensive engagement ring? Looks count." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 10 July 2018. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/07/180710101649.htm>.
Springer. (2018, July 10). Want an expensive engagement ring? Looks count. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 22, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/07/180710101649.htm
Springer. "Want an expensive engagement ring? Looks count." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/07/180710101649.htm (accessed April 22, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES