Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Women With Low-Risk Pregnancies Receive Fewer Obstetrical Interventions When Cared For By Midwives, Compared To Women Attended By Physicians

Date:
April 18, 1997
Source:
University of Washington
Summary:
Low-risk patients who choose nurse midwives for their obstetrical care have fewer Caesarean sections, receive less anesthesia, have a much lower rate of episiotomy and incur less expense, compared to similar women who choose physicians for their care

Low-risk patients who choose nurse midwives for their obstetrical care have fewer Caesarean sections, receive less anesthesia, have a much lower rate of episiotomy and incur less expense, compared to similar women who choose physicians for their care. At the same time, obstetricians, family physicians and nurse midwives all achieve excellent results.

These are the conclusions of a University of Washington study reported in the current issue of the American Journal of Public Health.

"Nurse midwives establish a relationship with their patients that leads to excellent outcomes with less use of medical resources," said Dr. Roger A. Rosenblatt, UW professor of family medicine and principal investigator on the study. "Pregnancy is the most common reason that women spend time in hospitals, and there are major differences in the way physicians and nurse midwives approach low-risk patients."

The researchers took a random sample of all the urban practitioners in Washington state who deliver babies in hospitals: nurse midwives, family doctors, and obstetricians. They then took a random sample of those practitioners' low-risk patients, eventually analyzing 1,322 medical charts for more than 1,000 variables, covering mothers' and babies' status prenatally and during labor and birth.

The study found that the patients of certified nurse-midwives were less likely to receive continuous fetal monitoring or to have their labors induced or augmented. They were also less likely to receive epidural anesthesia. Overall, patients of midwives used 12 percent fewer resources than patients of physicians. Rosenblatt noted that midwives account for only 4 percent of deliveries in this country; they deliver the majority of babies in many countries, including Britain.

The Caesarean-section rate for patients of certified nurse midwives was 8.8 percent, compared to 13.6 percent for obstetricians and 15.1 percent for family physicians. "We used an 'intention-to-treat' protocol," explained Rosenblatt. "For example, if the patient of a midwife ended up needing a C-section, the procedure was attributed to the midwife, not to the obstetrician who performed the surgery."

The study found little difference between the practice patterns of the two groups of physicians. Obstetricians and family physicians seem to be very similar in their approaches to low-risk pregnant women.

"The major limitation of our study was that women chose their own provider, rather than being randomly allocated to different types of care," Rosenblatt acknowledged. "But in the United States, patient choice is very important. The characteristics of the women as well as the practice style of the provider likely influenced the type of care received. But the study showed that in some patients, it is possible to achieve lower rates of obstetrical intervention by adding midwives to the provider mix.

"This was not a study of quality of care, but of cost and outcome," said Rosenblatt. "However, we found that labor and delivery are incredibly safe in the state of Washington. There were no neonatal deaths, and the five-minute Apgar scores (a numerical assessment of newborn status five minutes after birth) were very high.

"We hope that this study sparks discussions of less intrusive styles of obstetric care, even among nurse midwives," he said. "Most of them worked in sophisticated urban hospitals, and half of their patients were given continuous fetal monitoring, even though earlier studies have shown that intermittent monitoring is just as effective."

The definition of low risk excluded 53 percent of pregnancies. Women were excluded from the study if they had a major medical condition, a previous obstetrical complication, a serious risk factor in the current pregnancy, no obstetrical care in the first trimester, or were under 18 or over 34 years old.

The study was funded by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Co-investigators are Drs. Sharon A. Dobie, L. Gary Hart, Ronald Schneeweiss and Michael J. Pirani of the UW Department of Family Medicine; Dr. Thomas J. Benedetti of the UW Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Dr. Edward B. Perrin of the UW Department of Health Services; Dr. Debra Gould of the University of Rochester Department of Family Medicine; and Dr. Tina R. Raine of the Georgetown University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by University of Washington. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

University of Washington. "Women With Low-Risk Pregnancies Receive Fewer Obstetrical Interventions When Cared For By Midwives, Compared To Women Attended By Physicians." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 18 April 1997. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1997/04/970418123423.htm>.
University of Washington. (1997, April 18). Women With Low-Risk Pregnancies Receive Fewer Obstetrical Interventions When Cared For By Midwives, Compared To Women Attended By Physicians. ScienceDaily. Retrieved July 22, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1997/04/970418123423.htm
University of Washington. "Women With Low-Risk Pregnancies Receive Fewer Obstetrical Interventions When Cared For By Midwives, Compared To Women Attended By Physicians." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1997/04/970418123423.htm (accessed July 22, 2014).

Share This




More Health & Medicine News

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Gilead's $1000-a-Pill Drug Could Cure Hep C in HIV-Positive People

Gilead's $1000-a-Pill Drug Could Cure Hep C in HIV-Positive People

TheStreet (July 21, 2014) New research shows Gilead Science's drug Sovaldi helps in curing hepatitis C in those who suffer from HIV. In a medical study, the combination of Gilead's Hep C drug with anti-viral drug Ribavirin cured 76% of HIV-positive patients suffering from the most common hepatitis C strain. Hepatitis C and related complications have been a top cause of death in HIV-positive patients. Typical medication used to treat the disease, including interferon proteins, tended to react badly with HIV drugs. However, Sovaldi's %1,000-a-pill price tag could limit the number of patients able to access the treatment. TheStreet's Keris Lahiff reports from New York. Video provided by TheStreet
Powered by NewsLook.com
$23.6 Billion Awarded To Widow In Smoking Lawsuit

$23.6 Billion Awarded To Widow In Smoking Lawsuit

Newsy (July 20, 2014) Cynthia Robinson claims R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company hid the health and addiction risks of its products, leading to the death of her husband in 1996. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Tooth Plaque Provides Insight Into Diets Of Ancient People

Tooth Plaque Provides Insight Into Diets Of Ancient People

Newsy (July 19, 2014) Research on plaque from ancient teeth shows that our prehistoric ancestor's had a detailed understanding of plants long before developing agriculture. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Contaminated Water Kills 3 Babies in South African Town

Contaminated Water Kills 3 Babies in South African Town

AFP (July 18, 2014) Contaminated water in South Africa's northwestern town of Bloemhof kills three babies and hospitalises over 500 people. The incident highlights growing fears over water safety in South Africa. Duration: 02:22 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins