Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

MR Is Better Than Mammography For Detecting Additional Disease In Women With Breast Cancer

Date:
October 4, 2004
Source:
American Roentgen Ray Society
Summary:
MR imaging is significantly better than mammography in detecting additional breast cancers in women who have already been diagnosed with the disease--an important finding that could ultimately affect the treatment of a significant fraction of new breast cancer patients, a new study shows.

MR imaging is significantly better than mammography in detecting additional breast cancers in women who have already been diagnosed with the disease--an important finding that could ultimately affect the treatment of a significant fraction of new breast cancer patients, a new study shows.

Related Articles


The study (The Italian Trial for Breast MR in Multifocal/Multicentric Cancer, promoted by The Italian Society of Medical Radiology) included 90 women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Some of the women had cancer detected in both breasts. Each of the women had a mammogram and an MR examination to determine if there were additional cancers that had not been initially detected, said Francesco Sardanelli, MD, lead author of the study, chief of diagnostic imaging at the Istituto Policlinico San Donato and professor at the Postgraduation School of Radiagnostic at the University of Milan, Italy. Previous studies have shown that as many as 42% of women diagnosed with breast cancer in one breast have at least one other malignant lesion in that same breast, Dr. Sardanelli said. "We need to identify as many as possible malignant areas in the patient's breast, so we and she can determine what is the best choice of treatment," he added.

Mammography detected 124 malignant lesions, while MR detected 152, Dr. Sardanelli said. All of the women had mastectomies. Their breasts were then examined by a pathologist. The pathologist found 188 malignancies, he said. While MR did not find all of the malignancies, it did find more than mammography, said Dr. Sardanelli. In addition, "the malignancies that were missed by mammography were significantly larger and more aggressive (70% were invasive cancers) overall than the malignant areas that were missed by MR," said Dr. Sardanelli. MR imaging was even more effective for women with dense breasts, noted Dr. Sardanelli.

If MR and mammography were combined, there was no real difference in the detection rate, said Dr. Sardanelli. "It is improbable that a malignant lesion would be detected with mammography and not detected by MR," he said.

This is the first study to compare MR and mammography with whole breast pathology results, said Dr. Sardanelli. Because the whole breast was examined under the microscope, "we were able to determine exactly how many other malignancies -- even the smallest malignancies -- were actually in each breast," he said. This made the comparison of the tests very reliable, he said.

"We are aware that the clinical significance of using MR to detect malignant areas is a matter for debate. If combined with radiation therapy, breast-conserving surgery gives survival rates not significantly different from those obtained with mastectomy. Randomized studies comparing patients with or without pretreatment MRI would be able to clarify the problem, but they are really difficult to plan and perform. On the basis of our study, we suggest a pretreatment dynamic MRI examination at least in patients with nonfatty breasts," Dr. Sardanelli said. "Moreover, we need complete cooperation with surgeons. We should try to avoid performing mastectomies on patients who could have a conservative intervention with the same outcome. We could downsize the aggressive approach frequently used today on patients with multifocal breast cancer. If MRI demonstrates that multifocality is confined in a quadrant, we can suggest a breast-conserving surgical approach," he said.

The study appears in the October 2004 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by American Roentgen Ray Society. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

American Roentgen Ray Society. "MR Is Better Than Mammography For Detecting Additional Disease In Women With Breast Cancer." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 4 October 2004. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/10/041001091244.htm>.
American Roentgen Ray Society. (2004, October 4). MR Is Better Than Mammography For Detecting Additional Disease In Women With Breast Cancer. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 27, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/10/041001091244.htm
American Roentgen Ray Society. "MR Is Better Than Mammography For Detecting Additional Disease In Women With Breast Cancer." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/10/041001091244.htm (accessed March 27, 2015).

Share This


More From ScienceDaily



More Health & Medicine News

Friday, March 27, 2015

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

House Ready to Pass Medicare Doc Bill

House Ready to Pass Medicare Doc Bill

AP (Mar. 26, 2015) — In rare bipartisan harmony, congressional leaders pushed a $214 billion bill permanently blocking physician Medicare cuts toward House passage Thursday, moving lawmakers closer to resolving a problem that has plagued them for years. (March 26) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
What's Different About This Latest Ebola Vaccine

What's Different About This Latest Ebola Vaccine

Newsy (Mar. 26, 2015) — A whole virus Ebola vaccine has been shown to protect monkeys exposed to the virus. Here&apos;s what&apos;s different about this vaccine. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
HIV Outbreak Prompts Public Health Emergency In Indiana

HIV Outbreak Prompts Public Health Emergency In Indiana

Newsy (Mar. 26, 2015) — Indiana Gov. Mike Pence says he will bring additional state resources to help stop the epidemic. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Indiana Permits Needle Exchange as HIV Cases Skyrocket

Indiana Permits Needle Exchange as HIV Cases Skyrocket

Reuters - US Online Video (Mar. 26, 2015) — Governor Mike Pence declares the recent HIV outbreak in rural Indiana a "public health emergency" and authorizes a short-term needle-exchange program. Rough Cut (no reporter narration) Video provided by Reuters
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:  

Breaking News:

Strange & Offbeat Stories

 

Health & Medicine

Mind & Brain

Living & Well

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:  

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile iPhone Android Web
Follow Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins