Science News

... from universities, journals, and other research organizations

FDA Statement On Iressa

Dec. 24, 2004 — December 17, 2004 -- The FDA today released the following statement regarding the failure of a clinical trial of Iressa (gefitinib) to show an overall survival advantage in treating patients with lung cancer:


Share This:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) learned yesterday from AstraZeneca that a large clinical trial comparing Iressa (gefitinib) with placebo in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had failed other courses of cancer therapy showed no survival benefit from taking Iressa.

Patients currently taking Iressa should consult with their physicians as soon as possible; patients should not change their therapy without first consulting with their physicians.

Alternative therapies are available. FDA has approved Taxotere (docetaxel) and Tarceva (erlotinib), both of which have been shown in studies to improve survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer whose cancer has progressed while on previous therapies.

FDA approved Iressa on May 2, 2003, under the Agency's accelerated approval (Subpart H) program, for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had failed two or more courses of chemotherapy. The accelerated approval provisions in FDA's regulations allow the agency to approve a drug for marketing based on an effect on a surrogate endpoint -- such as a sign of a disease or the results of a laboratory test -- that is considered reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit (improved symptoms or survival). Iressa was approved because the data from clinical trials showed that it caused significant shrinkage in tumors in about 10% of patients, and this was thought likely to increase patients' overall survival time.

One requirement for drugs approved under the agency's accelerated approval program is that the sponsor must study them further after approval to verify the expected clinical benefit. After the approval of Iressa in 2003, AstraZeneca conducted a study in approximately 1700 patients to determine whether the drug would in fact prolong survival in comparison to patients taking placebo. The results announced today indicate that the drug did not prolong survival. Under FDA's accelerated approval program, the Agency has the authority to remove a drug from the market if a postmarketing clinical study fails to verify clinical benefit. After FDA has evaluated the recent study results, FDA will determine whether Iressa should be withdrawn from the market or if other regulatory actions are appropriate.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by U.S. Food And Drug Administration.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


APA

MLA

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 137,328

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily's archives for related news topics,
the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing services:

|

 
  more breaking science news

Social Networks


Follow ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google:

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google +1:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Breaking News

... from NewsDaily.com

In Other News ...

Science Video News


Breathing Easier

Half of all lung transplant patients don't live past the fifth year after the procedure, due in part to chronic rejection of the new organs. A new,. ...  > full story

Strange Science News

 

Free Subscriptions

... from ScienceDaily

Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Feedback

... we want to hear from you!

Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?

Post this page to your favorite social bookmarking site:
Include this item in your blog or web site:
Cite this article in your essay, paper, or report:
Email this page's link to a friend or colleague: