ScienceDaily (Aug. 19, 2005) — A paper published in the recent issue of Psychophysiology describes differences in the brain's response (event-related potentials, or "ERPs") to pictures and words that describe the same object. In two studies, the authors evaluated how the brain reacts differently to a picture of an object or its name when people were looking for either the picture or the name in a visual display.

University students saw pictures of five simple objects and words corresponding to their names. Participants were instructed to keep a silent mental count of the appearance of a specific target. For instance, in the first study, they looked for the word "globe." Its appearance on screen created a noticeable brain response. "We found that the appearance of the word 'globe' elicited a large electrical response called the P300, a positive-going ERP that occurs about 300-500 ms after the presentation of a target, " author Todd Watson states.

Although it was not a target, the picture of the globe elicited a similar (although less pronounced) electrical response. In a second study, the specified object was the picture of a globe. Again, the authors found that a picture of the globe elicited a large P300. However unlike the first experiment, the other version of the object -- the word "globe" -- failed to elicit a prominent electrical response.

These intriguing results suggest that whereas a word may automatically activate a mental image of the same object (e.g., a globe), a picture does not necessarily activate its verbal name. In turn, these data suggest the possibility that processing images and words may involve distinct brain circuits that can, but do not always, "talk to" one another. These techniques could help us to understand how our brains respond differently to visual or verbal codes that describe the objects in the world around us, as well as how our brains evaluates similarity between different objects or concepts.

This study is published in the current issue of Psychophysiology. 

Psychophysiology reports on new theoretical, empirical and methodological advances in: psychology and psychiatry, cognitive science, cognitive and affective neuroscience, social science, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. It is published on behalf of the Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Todd Watson is a Ph.D. candidate in Biopsychology at Stony Brook University. He has been published in numerous publications. 

Story Source:

Adapted from materials provided by Blackwell Publishing Ltd..

Related Stories

New Thoughts On Language Acquisition: Toddlers As Data Miners (Feb. 4, 2008) — Researchers are studying a ground-breaking theory that young children are able to learn large groups of words rapidly by data-mining. Their theory, which they have explored with 12- and ...  > read more

Taking Cues: Sometimes Environmental Cues Can Activate Thrifty Behavior (Mar. 31, 2009) — Consumers are constantly bombarded with subtle and even subconscious cues from their environment. A new study examines whether these cues activate goals that affect behavior in the long term or ...  > read more

Switchboard In The Brain Helps Us Learn And Remember At The Same Time (Jan. 16, 2009) — The brain is in a constant struggle between learning new experiences and remembering old experiences, PLoS Biology reports. Most social interactions require the rapid exchange of new and old ...  > read more

Brain Fends Off Distractions (Mar. 26, 2007) — Dutch researcher Harm Veling has demonstrated that our brains fend off distractions. If we are busy with something we suppress disrupting external influences. If we are tired, we can no longer do ...  > read more

Children With Autism Have Difficulty Recognizing Ordinary Words (May 7, 2007) — Young children with autism have a difficult time recognizing ordinary words such as ball, dog and cat and more of their brains are occupied with this kind of task compared to typically developing ...  > read more

Search ScienceDaily

Learn To Read Through Sound