Science News

... from universities, journals, and other research organizations

Pooled Data Examines If SNPs Add To Breast Cancer Risk

Oct. 5, 2006 — Pooling data from numerous studies has helped scientists examine specific genetic variants related to breast cancer incidence, according to a study in the October 4 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.


Share This:

The Breast Cancer Association Consortium brought together data from more than 20 groups conducting breast cancer research. Numerous studies by the collaboration's groups have identified a number of single nucleotide polymorphisms' single variations in a gene, known as SNPs, that may be linked to breast cancer.

The collaborating groups identified 16 SNPs that had been analyzed by at least three of their studies. They pooled data from all studies for each SNP and assessed how frequently the genetic change occurred in breast cancer patients compared to controls.

The authors found that five of the SNPs might be linked to breast cancer risk (with borderline statistical significance) and 11 were not. They suggest that pooling data from many groups can enable large sample sizes necessary to see associations when effects are moderate.

"This study illustrates the value of large consortia for clarifying risks associated with complex diseases," the authors write.

In an accompanying editorial, John P.A. Ioannidis, M.D., of the University of Ioannina School of Medicine in Greece, calls the study an "impressive collaborative effort." He discusses the difficulty of designing studies to accurately assess the significance of rare genetic changes. He writes, "If common genetic variants modulate susceptibility to common diseases such as breast cancer, we now have excellent tools to dissect them."

Article: The Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:1382-1396.

Editorial: Ioannidis JPA. Common genetic variants for breast cancer: 32 largely refuted candidates and larger prospects. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1350-1353.

Note: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is published by Oxford University Press and is not affiliated with the National Cancer Institute. Attribution to the Journal of the National Cancer Institute is requested in all news coverage. Visit the Journal online at http://jncicancerspectrum.oxfordjournals.org/.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Journal of the National Cancer Institute, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


APA

MLA

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 138,557

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily's archives for related news topics,
the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing services:

|

 
Interested in ad-free access? If you'd like to read ScienceDaily without ads, let us know!
  more breaking science news

Social Networks


Follow ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter,
and Google:

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google +1:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Breaking News

... from NewsDaily.com

  • more science news

In Other News ...

  • more top news

Science Video News


Blood Test For Breast Cancer

Biochemists look at 22 protein biomarkers to distinguish patients with breast cancer from those without it. The early detection test complements. ...  > full story

Strange Science News

 

Free Subscriptions

... from ScienceDaily

Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Feedback

... we want to hear from you!

Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?

Post this page to your favorite social bookmarking site:
Include this item in your blog or web site:
Cite this article in your essay, paper, or report:
Email this page's link to a friend or colleague: