Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Chlamydia Screening Programs: When Will We Ever Learn?

Date:
April 6, 2007
Source:
BMJ-British Medical Journal
Summary:
The value of opportunistic chlamydia screening is being called into question. An epidemiologist at the University of Berne in Switzerland argues that claims about screening are not supported by rigorous research or practice.

The value of opportunistic chlamydia screening is called into question in this week's British Medical Journal. Dr Nicola Low, an epidemiologist at the University of Berne in Switzerland argues that claims about screening are not supported by rigorous research or practice.

And she shows how uncritical acceptance of the effectiveness of chlamydia screening in Sweden and the United States led to the funding of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England, before the balance of benefits and harms was understood.

Chlamydia trachomatis is a common, curable, easily diagnosed, sexually transmitted infection that usually causes no symptoms. It can, however, cause devastating complications, including infertility, ectopic pregnancy, neonatal infection, and facilitation of HIV transmission.

There are two types of screening programme -- proactive and opportunistic. Proactive screening uses population registers to invite people to be screened at regular intervals, while opportunistic screening targets people attending health services for unrelated reasons.

Chlamydia screening of selected groups is currently recommended in a range of health care settings in Sweden, the United States and Canada. In England, a programme offering opportunistic chlamydia screening to all sexually active women and men under 25 years is due to be implemented by 2008. Yet no randomised controlled trial has shown that this type of screening programme reduces long term illness.

Furthermore, most studies showing that chlamydia screening is cost effective do not satisfy accepted quality criteria for economic evaluations, says the author. They also tend to overestimate the cost effectiveness of chlamydia screening. Introducing a chlamydia screening programme is therefore likely to be an expensive intervention.

In Sweden, decreases in rates of chlamydia and its complications occurred at the same time as both widespread chlamydia testing and national HIV prevention efforts were introduced. This trend was widely attributed to opportunistic chlamydia screening. This has led to uncritical acceptance of the effectiveness of chlamydia screening, which still persists, despite increasing rates of diagnosed chlamydia since 1995, writes Low. In the US, screening has also been credited with decreases in rates of infection.

Belief in the success of opportunistic screening persists, despite an absence of evidence of effectiveness and increasing rates of chlamydia in countries that are assumed to have such programmes. Unsubstantiated belief also seems to have allowed the requirements of the National Screening Committee and the experience of other UK screening programmes to be over-ridden, she adds.

She believes that an agreed definition of a screening programme is needed, and that the same standards should be applied to all diseases for which screening is in place, or is being considered. Countries implementing or contemplating national chlamydia screening should conduct research to determine if such screening programmes do more good than harm at reasonable cost, she concludes.

"Despite multiple campaigns in the media, the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections continues to increase," write two senior doctors in an accompanying editorial. "Most people who are affected are unlikely to seek sexual health testing and may only be assessed via a proactive approach rather than the opportunistic screening programme currently offered."


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by BMJ-British Medical Journal. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

BMJ-British Medical Journal. "Chlamydia Screening Programs: When Will We Ever Learn?." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 6 April 2007. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070405214008.htm>.
BMJ-British Medical Journal. (2007, April 6). Chlamydia Screening Programs: When Will We Ever Learn?. ScienceDaily. Retrieved July 28, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070405214008.htm
BMJ-British Medical Journal. "Chlamydia Screening Programs: When Will We Ever Learn?." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070405214008.htm (accessed July 28, 2014).

Share This




More Health & Medicine News

Monday, July 28, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Trees Could Save More Than 850 Lives Each Year

Trees Could Save More Than 850 Lives Each Year

Newsy (July 27, 2014) A national study conducted by the USDA Forest Service found that trees collectively save more than 850 lives on an annual basis. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Google's Next Frontier: The Human Body

Google's Next Frontier: The Human Body

Newsy (July 27, 2014) Google is collecting genetic and molecular information to paint a picture of the perfectly healthy human. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
What's To Blame For Worst Ebola Outbreak In History?

What's To Blame For Worst Ebola Outbreak In History?

Newsy (July 27, 2014) A U.S. doctor has tested positive for the deadly Ebola virus, as the worst-ever outbreak continues to grow. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Losing Sleep Leaves You Vulnerable To 'False Memories'

Losing Sleep Leaves You Vulnerable To 'False Memories'

Newsy (July 27, 2014) A new study shows sleep deprivation can make it harder for people to remember specific details of an event. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins