Science News
from research organizations

Wide discrepancy in surveillance and control of infections in ICUs

Date:
October 15, 2012
Source:
Columbia University Medical Center
Summary:
Screening practices for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care units (ICUs) vary widely from hospital to hospital, according to a new study.
Share:
       
FULL STORY

Screening practices for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care units (ICUs) vary widely from hospital to hospital, according to a new study by researchers at Columbia University School of Nursing and published in the October 2012 issue of the American Journal of Infection Control.

Researchers found that of the hospitals surveyed, a little more than half (59 percent) routinely screened for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aurea, or MRSA. Other potentially deadly MDROs were screened for far less frequently: vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (22 percent), gram-negative rods (12 percent), and C. difficile (11 percent).

The survey showed that not all hospitals follow a comprehensive screening and surveillance policy for infectious disease in the ICU, including the isolation of at-risk patients both during and after laboratory tests for infection. For example, although almost all of the ICUs (98 percent) reported a policy for contact precautions following a positive culture, less than a third reported a policy requiring isolation/contact precautions pending screening results.

While lead author Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz, PhD, MPH, advocates hospitals tailoring their response to the types and frequency of infection in their local areas, she thinks that some measures included in her study make good sense from a precaution perspective. "It seems prudent to isolate possibly infected patients admitted into the ICU until lab tests come back giving an 'all clear,'" she says.

The researchers found that a larger infection-control staff and longer infection-control staffing hours were associated with better implementation of policy to isolate culture-positive patients. They also found that ICUs with mandatory reporting and electronic surveillance systems were more likely to have a policy of periodic screening for infection after admission.

The research was supported by National Institute of Nursing Research grant RO1NR010107.


Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Columbia University Medical Center. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Monika Pogorzelska, Patricia W. Stone, Elaine L. Larson. Wide variation in adoption of screening and infection control interventions for multidrug-resistant organisms: A national study. American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 40, Issue 8 , Pages 696-700, October 2012 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.03.014

Cite This Page:

Columbia University Medical Center. "Wide discrepancy in surveillance and control of infections in ICUs." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 15 October 2012. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121015161916.htm>.
Columbia University Medical Center. (2012, October 15). Wide discrepancy in surveillance and control of infections in ICUs. ScienceDaily. Retrieved July 30, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121015161916.htm
Columbia University Medical Center. "Wide discrepancy in surveillance and control of infections in ICUs." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121015161916.htm (accessed July 30, 2015).

Share This Page: