Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) are booming in popularity -- but there's still only limited evidence on their potential health risks, or their advertised benefits in helping people to quit smoking, according to a research review in the July/August Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine.The journal is published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a part of Wolters Kluwer Health.
Based on their review, Alison B. Breland, PhD, of Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, and colleagues, write, "[V]ery little is known about the acute and longer-term effects of ECIG use for individuals and the public health, especially given the dramatic variability in ECIG devices, liquids, and user behavior." The work was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health and the Center for Tobacco Products of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Potential Health Concerns, But Limited Data on ECIG Safety
Also known as "electronic nicotine delivery systems," ECIGs consist of a heating element that turns an "e-liquid" solution into vapor, which the user inhales. The ECIG solutions typically contain nicotine, but not always. E-cigarette models vary widely in design and appearance -- some resemble cigarettes, but a wide range of other designs and configurations are available.
Since nothing is burned, ECIG vapor does not contain many of the toxins present in tobacco smoke. Some potentially toxic substances are found in ECIG vapor, but they are present at much lower levels than in tobacco smoke. Concerns have also been raised about the nicotine content of ECIG liquids, which range from absent or minimal to potentially toxic levels.
Some laboratory studies suggest ECIG use has short-term effects on lung function similar to those produced by cigarette smoking, while other studies report no acute impairment The effects of inhaled nicotine in ECIG vapor can be similar to that of nicotine in tobacco smoke.
There is little or no evidence on the long-term effects of ECIG use. The authors write, "No existing studies address the extent to which the inhalation of ECIG vapor hundreds of times every day over a period of multiple years influences human health, particularly pulmonary function."
Are E-Cigarettes a Useful Quit-Smoking Aid?
Surveys suggest rising awareness and use of ECIGs, with most users being cigarette smokers. In a 2013 study, 13 percent of college students said they had tried ECIGs.
There is some evidence that ECIGs can reduce tobacco abstinence symptoms in cigarette smokers, but it's unclear how much this is related to nicotine delivery or to psychological effects. So far, the best available studies -- two randomized clinical trials -- have shown no significant difference in quit rates among in ECIG users.
In the absence of high-quality research evidence, there's currently no way to analyze the ongoing arguments for and against ECIGs. However, research however shows that the societal price of addiction to nicotine is high -- tobacco use in the US is implicated in more deaths each year than alcohol and illicit drugs combined.
Given the "substantial knowledge gaps," the authors highlight the need for further research on the health effects of ECIGs. They note: "Given today's inability to generalize across ECIGs, individuals, and populations, all stakeholders in the ECIG debate, regardless of their opinions concerning the public health effects of ECIGs, must acknowledge that there is much to be learned about this rapidly evolving product category…generalization in the absence of data is speculation, not science."
The above story is based on materials provided by Wolters Kluwer Health: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
- Alison B. Breland, Tory Spindle, Michael Weaver, Thomas Eissenberg. Science and Electronic Cigarettes. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 2014; 8 (4): 223 DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000049
- Michael Weaver, Alison Breland, Tory Spindle, Thomas Eissenberg. Electronic Cigarettes. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 2014; 8 (4): 234 DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000043
Cite This Page: