New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Review of the landscape conservation cooperatives

Date:
December 3, 2015
Source:
National Academy of Sciences
Summary:
Because fish, wildlife, habitats, and cultural resources extend beyond political boundaries, there is a national need to develop resource management strategies across jurisdictions and sectors, says a new congressionally mandated report.
Share:
FULL STORY

Because fish, wildlife, habitats, and cultural resources extend beyond political boundaries, there is a national need to develop resource management strategies across jurisdictions and sectors, says a new congressionally mandated report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCCs), initiated by the U.S. Department of the Interior in 2009 and coordinated by the department's Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), were created to address this national need and can point to many early accomplishments. Ultimately, the long-term success of this effort will depend on developing ways to measure and demonstrate benefits to its conservation partners and the nation.

At the request of Congress, FWS asked the Academies to convene a committee to evaluate the LCCs, a network of 22 regional conservation partnerships in the United States, including the Pacific and Caribbean islands, as well as parts of Canada and Mexico. Each LCC is tasked with creating a collaborative framework to develop shared conservation priorities and identify applied research needs across federal agencies, state agencies, tribes, private landholders, and other stakeholders working on conservation efforts within its region.

Individual LCCs have generated some early accomplishments, such as identifying partners, establishing governance structures and steering committees, and developing shared conservation and research priorities for use by all partners, says the report. It is too soon to expect the network as a whole to have made measurable improvements to managing fish, bird, and other wildlife populations and their habitats. In addition, the LCC network needs to improve its evaluation process to better capture the contributions made by all partners toward common objectives and to better measure and demonstrate benefits to its partners.

The report finds that LCCs are unique in that they are designed to address landscape needs at a national level for all natural and cultural resources as well as to bridge conservation research and management. Similar federal programs are more narrowly focused and the LCCs generally seek to coordinate with other programs where their interests overlap. Moving forward, the LCC network needs to strengthen coordination with other programs that have a strong interest in landscape approaches to conservation to avoid duplicative efforts and limit demands on state agency and other partners that participate in multiple programs.

Access the report at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/21829/a-review-of-the-landscape-conservation-cooperatives


Story Source:

Materials provided by National Academy of Sciences. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Cite This Page:

National Academy of Sciences. "Review of the landscape conservation cooperatives." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 3 December 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/12/151203135852.htm>.
National Academy of Sciences. (2015, December 3). Review of the landscape conservation cooperatives. ScienceDaily. Retrieved March 28, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/12/151203135852.htm
National Academy of Sciences. "Review of the landscape conservation cooperatives." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/12/151203135852.htm (accessed March 28, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES