Science News
from research organizations

Affordable housing not so affordable when transportation costs soar

Date:
March 21, 2016
Source:
University of Texas at Arlington
Summary:
A new report assesses the affordability of US Department of Housing and Urban Development rental assistance properties from the perspective of transportation costs.
Share:
FULL STORY

The availability of public transportation and the cost of individual transportation play major factors in just how affordable subsidized housing is in North Texas and across the country.

Shima Hamidi, a University of Texas at Arlington assistant professor in the College of Architecture, Planning and Public Affairs, published a study in Housing Policy Debate journal that assesses the affordability of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development rental assistance properties from the perspective of transportation costs.

The study examines how location affects affordability in reality.

"What we discovered is that many of these locations around the U.S. that don't have public transportation don't really offer affordable housing because residents have to purchase a car, insurance and spend time commuting," Hamidi said. "It becomes a social equity issue. The ability to get to quality jobs or schools is limited because some of the people can't afford it because of the transportation costs."

Hamidi collaborated with Reid Ewing, professor and director of the Metropolitan Research Center in the College of Architecture + Planning at the University of Utah.

"The study recommends that public entities have to locate affordable housing where public transit is available or offer transportation subsidies so people can afford cars and insurance," Hamidi said.

Nationally, the research discovered that 44 percent of 8,857 affordable housing units studied had occupants who spent on average more than 15 percent of their income on transportation costs.

Not surprisingly, the ratio of transportation costs to incomes for residents of affordable housing units rose dramatically in many areas without public transit.

Dallas was well above that 44 percent benchmark at 72 percent. Phoenix came in at a remarkable 97 percent. Buffalo registered at 84 percent. And Pittsburgh had 82 percent of its affordable housing units spending more than 15 percent of its household income on transportation.

Nan Ellin, dean of UTA's College of Architecture, Planning and Public Affairs, said Hamidi's research shines light on an important problem that could be fixed.

"Affordability is a misnomer if you don't consider additional costs associated with a housing location," Ellin said. "Dr. Hamidi's study illuminates these costs, offering decision makers a superior tool in the creation of truly affordable housing and healthy sustainable communities."

The project is representative of research excellence that is advancing UTA's commitment to improve sustainable urban communities under the University's Strategic Plan 2020: Bold Solutions | Global Impact.


Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Texas at Arlington. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Shima Hamidi, Reid Ewing, John Renne. How Affordable Is HUD Affordable Housing? Housing Policy Debate, 2016; 1 DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2015.1123753

Cite This Page:

University of Texas at Arlington. "Affordable housing not so affordable when transportation costs soar." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 21 March 2016. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160321123810.htm>.
University of Texas at Arlington. (2016, March 21). Affordable housing not so affordable when transportation costs soar. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 23, 2017 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160321123810.htm
University of Texas at Arlington. "Affordable housing not so affordable when transportation costs soar." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/03/160321123810.htm (accessed May 23, 2017).

RELATED STORIES