Science News

... from universities, journals, and other research organizations

Ultrasound Measurement of Fetal Adrenal Gland a Better Predictor of Preterm Birth

Feb. 19, 2010 — In a study to be presented February 4 at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's (SMFM) annual meeting, The Pregnancy Meeting ™, in Chicago, researchers will unveil findings that show that measuring the fetal zone of the adrenal gland is a better predictor of pre-term birth than measuring cervical length.


Share This:

Researchers with the University of Maryland and Yale University have followed up on early research that they conducted using 3D ultrasound methods.

"We previously discovered that 3D adrenal gland volume (AGV) is a very accurate predictor of preterm birth," said Dr. Ozhan Turan, the study's author. "However most people around the world don't have access to that technology, therefore, we have created measurements that can be done with 2D ultrasound that are very effective to predict pre-term birth."

In the study, patients presenting with preterm labor symptoms had ultrasound measurement of the cervical length (CL) and fetal adrenal gland dimension. Using 3D ultrasound with VOCAL cAGV (AGV/ Estimated fetal weight), 2D depth of the whole-gland (D) and fetal zone (d) were measured. The d/D ratio was calculated as an index of FZE. The cAGV, d/D and CL were compared for prediction of preterm birth within seven days.

Sixty-two singletons with preterm labor at 23-37 wks´ gestation were studied. Measurement-to-delivery interval only correlated with cAGV and d/D (r=-0.32 p=0.011 and r=-0.47 p=0.001respectively) but not CL (p=0.83). Twenty women had preterm birth at less than seven days (Group A) while 42 (Group B) delivered in seven days or more from initial assessment. While CL was similar (p=0.5) cAGV and d/D were higher in group A (p< 0.0001 for both). ROC area under the curve was significantly greater for cAGV and d/D than for CL (0.82, 0.91 and 0.59, p< 0.01 and 0.001 respectively, fig) without any significant differences between adrenal gland measurements. Using ROC derived cutoffs for preterm birth in less than seven days was best predicted by d/D and cAGV but not CL.

"Prior to this we haven't had a good method to predict who will present with pre-term labor." said Dr. Turan. "Measuring the cervical length leads to a high percentage of false positives and also it has limited sensitivity," he continued. "Hopefully, if adopted, this method will allow for an easy inexpensive way to identify real pre-term deliveries. Therefore we will be better managing these pregnancies."

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


APA

MLA

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 137,076

Find with keyword(s):
 
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily's archives for related news topics,
the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.

Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing services:

|

 
  more breaking science news

Social Networks


Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google +1:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

|

Breaking News

... from NewsDaily.com

In Other News ...

Science Video News


Mini Fetal Monitor Saves Lives

High risk pregnancy specialists designed a fetal monitoring device that tracks a baby's position and movement in the womb, as well as baby and mother. ...  > full story

Strange Science News

 

Free Subscriptions

... from ScienceDaily

Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Feedback

... we want to hear from you!

Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?

Post this page to your favorite social bookmarking site:
Include this item in your blog or web site:
Cite this article in your essay, paper, or report:
Email this page's link to a friend or colleague: