Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Aggressive control of cardiac risk factors might not benefit all patients with diabetes

Date:
August 10, 2010
Source:
JAMA and Archives Journals
Summary:
A mathematical model suggests that aggressively pursuing low blood pressure and cholesterol levels may not benefit, and could even harm, some patients with diabetes, according to a new study.

A mathematical model suggests that aggressively pursuing low blood pressure and cholesterol levels may not benefit, and could even harm, some patients with diabetes, according to a report in the June 28 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.

Almost all treatment guidelines for patients with diabetes suggest aggressively treating high low-density lipoprotein (LDL or "bad" cholesterol) and blood pressure levels to reduce patients' risk of developing heart disease, according to background information in the article. "These recommendations, which are based on the average results of trials evaluating the relative benefits of intensive risk factor control, are not tailored to an individual's underlying cardiovascular disease risk," the authors write. "While this [risk stratification] approach is often advocated in patients without diabetes mellitus, there is an implicit assumption that all patients with diabetes mellitus are at equally high risk, requiring all patients to be treated aggressively."

Justin W. Timbie, Ph.D., of RAND Corp., Arlington, Va., and colleagues constructed a mathematical model to assess whether aggressive treatment would equally benefit all patients with diabetes. They began with data from 30- to 75-year-old participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which provided representative estimates for the nearly 8 million individuals with diabetes in the 1990s. At this time, aggressive cholesterol and blood pressure treatment was uncommon. After excluding participants with low LDL levels and low blood pressure, the average LDL-C level was 151 milligrams per deciliter and the average blood pressure was 144/79 millimeters of mercury.

The researchers then simulated what would happen if these patients underwent increasingly intensive treatment until their LDL-C levels were lowered to 100 milligrams per deciliter and their blood pressure to 130/80 millimeters of mercury. Treating to these targets resulted in estimated gains of 1.5 quality-adjusted life years -- years of life in perfect health -- for LDL-C levels and 1.35 for blood pressure. These gains declined to 1.42 quality-adjusted life years for LDL-C and to 1.16 for blood pressure after considering treatment-related harms, which include muscle pain from taking statins and the safety hazards of taking multiple medications.

"Most of the total benefit was limited to the first few steps of medication intensification or to tight control for a limited group of very high-risk patients," the authors write. The nearly three-fourths of patients at average risk, however, received very little benefit. "By accounting for treatment-related harms, we identified numerous examples in which intensifying treatment would be contraindicated on the basis of risk-benefit considerations, and many more instances in which the expected benefits would be so small that shared patient-clinician decision making would seem to be the appropriate medical intervention."

"Given the large set of factors that moderate the benefit of treatment intensification, including patients' underlying cardiovascular disease risk, the diminishing efficacy of combination therapy and increasing polypharmacy and adverse effects, we recommend a strategy of tailoring treatments to individual patients on the basis of their expected benefit of intensifying treatment," they conclude. "Current treatment approaches that encourage uniformly lowering risk factors to common target levels can be both inefficient and cause unnecessary harm."

Editorial: Models Illuminate Complexity of Clinical Decisions

"Like all models, this one involves numerous assumptions, mysterious concepts, such as disutility and discounting, and statistical approaches unfamiliar to many physicians," writes Andrew L. Avins, M.D., M.P.H., of Northern California Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, in an accompanying editorial. "And, like all models, there are assumptions that could be disputed (e.g., specific treatment strategies and baseline estimates of some parameters). However, the lessons to be gleaned from this simulation are profound."

"Most important, the results starkly challenge some fundamental assertions regarding the appropriate treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus," Dr. Avins writes. "Over the years, practice guidelines have advocated increasingly tighter control of blood glucose and cardiovascular risk factors, often relying on logical inference to extend thresholds beyond the available empirical evidence. The model developed by Timbie et al suggests that the diminishing returns of more aggressive therapy might not only be inefficient but potentially harmful."

"The principles illustrated by the model of Timbie et al are general and apply to virtually all preventive interventions," Dr. Avins concludes. "One wonders why such examinations are not generally incorporated into the guideline development process rather than, as in this case, conducted in response to it."


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by JAMA and Archives Journals. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal References:

  1. Justin W. Timbie; Rodney A. Hayward; Sandeep Vijan. Variation in the Net Benefit of Aggressive Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control Across the US Population of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus. Arch Intern Med, 2010; 170 (12): 1037-1044 [link]
  2. Andrew L. Avins. When Clinical Practice Guidelines Meet the Black Box. Arch Intern Med, 2010; 170 (12): 1013-1014 [link]

Cite This Page:

JAMA and Archives Journals. "Aggressive control of cardiac risk factors might not benefit all patients with diabetes." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 10 August 2010. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100628161119.htm>.
JAMA and Archives Journals. (2010, August 10). Aggressive control of cardiac risk factors might not benefit all patients with diabetes. ScienceDaily. Retrieved September 18, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100628161119.htm
JAMA and Archives Journals. "Aggressive control of cardiac risk factors might not benefit all patients with diabetes." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100628161119.htm (accessed September 18, 2014).

Share This



More Health & Medicine News

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

Artificial Sweetener Could Promote Diabetes

Artificial Sweetener Could Promote Diabetes

Newsy (Sep. 17, 2014) Doctors once thought artificial sweeteners lacked the health risks of sugar, but a new study says they can impact blood sugar levels the same way. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Ebola Vaccine Trial Gets Underway at Oxford University

Ebola Vaccine Trial Gets Underway at Oxford University

AFP (Sep. 17, 2014) A healthy British volunteer is to become the first person to receive a new vaccine for the Ebola virus after US President Barack Obama called for action against the epidemic and warned it was "spiralling out of control." Duration: 01:02 Video provided by AFP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Obesity Rates Steady Even As Americans' Waistlines Expand

Obesity Rates Steady Even As Americans' Waistlines Expand

Newsy (Sep. 17, 2014) Researchers are puzzled as to why obesity rates remain relatively stable as average waistlines continue to expand. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
President To Send 3,000 Military Personnel To Fight Ebola

President To Send 3,000 Military Personnel To Fight Ebola

Newsy (Sep. 16, 2014) President Obama is expected to send 3,000 troops to West Africa as part of the effort to contain Ebola's spread. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins