New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

No evidence for 'knots' in space: Theories of primordial universe predict existence of knots in space

Date:
June 13, 2012
Source:
University College London
Summary:
Theories of the primordial universe predict the existence of knots in the fabric of space -- known as cosmic textures -- which could be identified by looking at light from the cosmic microwave background, the relic radiation left over from the Big Bang. Astronomers have performed the first search for textures on the full sky, finding no evidence for such knots in space.
Share:
FULL STORY

Theories of the primordial Universe predict the existence of knots in the fabric of space -- known as cosmic textures -- which could be identified by looking at light from the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the relic radiation left over from the Big Bang.

Using data from NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite, researchers from UCL, Imperial College London and the Perimeter Institute have performed the first search for textures on the full sky, finding no evidence for such knots in space.

As the Universe cooled it underwent a series of phase transitions, analogous to water freezing into ice. Many transitions cannot occur consistently throughout space, giving rise in some theories to imperfections in the structure of the cooling material known as cosmic textures.

If produced in the early Universe, textures would interact with light from the CMB to leave a set of characteristic hot and cold spots. If detected, such signatures would yield invaluable insight into the types of phase transitions that occurred when the Universe was a fraction of a second old, with drastic implications for particle physics.

A previous study, published in Science in 2007, provided a tantalising hint that a CMB feature known as the "Cold Spot" could be due to a cosmic texture. However, the CMB Cold Spot only comprises around 3% of the available sky area, and an analysis using the full microwave sky had not been performed.

The new study, published June 13 in Physical Review Letters, places the best limits available on theories that produce textures, ruling out at 95% confidence theories that produce more than six detectable textures on our sky.

Stephen Feeney, from the UCL Department of Physics and Astronomy and lead author, said: "If textures were observed, they would provide invaluable insight into the way nature works at tremendous energies, shedding light on the unification of the physical forces. The tantalizing hints found in a previous small-scale search meant it was extremely important to carry out this full-sky analysis."

Co-author Matt Johnson, from the Perimeter Institute, Canada, said: "Although there is no evidence for these objects in the WMAP data, this is not the last word: in a few months we will have access to much better data from the Planck satellite. Whether we find textures in the Planck data or further constrain the theories that produce them, only time will tell!"


Story Source:

Materials provided by University College London. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Stephen M. Feeney, Matthew C. Johnson, Daniel J. Mortlock, Hiranya V. Peiris. A robust constraint on cosmic textures from the cosmic microwave background. Physical Review Letters, June 13, 2012 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.241301

Cite This Page:

University College London. "No evidence for 'knots' in space: Theories of primordial universe predict existence of knots in space." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 13 June 2012. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120613102249.htm>.
University College London. (2012, June 13). No evidence for 'knots' in space: Theories of primordial universe predict existence of knots in space. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 26, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120613102249.htm
University College London. "No evidence for 'knots' in space: Theories of primordial universe predict existence of knots in space." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120613102249.htm (accessed April 26, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES