Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations

Is 'Nanny State' ethical when policing obesity?

Date:
March 19, 2014
Source:
Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics
Summary:
Public health and bioethics experts examine three public policy strategies for obesity prevention through reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in a new article. Obesity is a serious public health problem in America, and policy solutions are fraught with ethical challenges; how can this multi-faceted problem be tackled while maintaining individual freedom of choice and avoiding stigmatization?

Obesity is a serious public health problem in America, and policy solutions are fraught with ethical challenges; how can this multi-faceted problem be tackled while maintaining individual freedom of choice and avoiding stigmatization?

Fairness, respect, and consistency in government public health policies are crucial to the answer, according to an opinion from experts at the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and California Food Policy Advocates published in the American Journal of Public Health.

Focusing specifically on the ethics of various strategies for reducing obesity through disincentives to consume sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), the opinion draws key connections and distinctions between three strategies:

(1) restricting sale of SSBs in public schools,

(2) levying significant taxes on SSBs, and

(3) prohibiting the use of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP; formerly food stamps program) benefits for the purchase of SSBs.

"Obesity is truly a national epidemic in the United States, affecting one in three adults and one in six children, says Nancy Kass, co-author of the opinion, a professor at the Berman Institute of Bioethics and Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University. "We focus on sugar-sweetened beverages because they are the largest single contributor to Americans' caloric intake."

Regarding accusations of a "nanny state" and government interference in individual choice, the authors suggest that framing is incorrect, and that in addition to the health implications of being overweight, the wide economic disparities of obesity create a government duty to enact policies to prevent injustice.

"[T]he systematically higher rates of obesity among food-insecure individuals compared with the food-secure raise questions whether public policy around obesity prevention should be labeled government interference with individual preference, or government responsibility in the name of social justice," the opinion states.

A ban on school sales of SSBs and, to a lesser degree, taxation of SSBs, score well in terms of fairness, the opinion says, because they apply across demographics, while the proposed food stamp ban targets SNAP participants exclusively. Such a practice, proposed in California, Florida, Missouri, Wisconsin and Texas, would not "pass ethical acceptability."

"[A]SNAP exclusion, implemented alone, sends a public policy message that poor people require government intervention to manage their food choices whereas higher- income persons do not," the opinion states. The authors dismiss the objection that a sales tax is unfair to lower-income individuals, saying "regressive taxation becomes most troubling from a fairness perspective when applied to basic necessities -- such as clothing, housing, or food. Sugar-sweetened beverages, containing no nutritional value, are not a basic necessity." Rather, taxes reflect the preferences of a society valuing free choice, opting for disincentives rather than prohibitions, with SSBs remaining widely available on the market, the opinion states. It goes on to say that taxation would be most fair if those who "enable and benefit" from the sale of SSBs share in the burden through excise taxes, with the portion passed on to the consumer only adding to the disincentive of a sales tax. The opinion addresses the "nannying" concerns squarely by highlighting that under all of the policies considered, SSBs remain widely available to the public. Further, data increasingly show that much human eating behavior -absent any policy intervention -- is widely influenced by factors such as portion and container size and price, and thus remains at least as much the result of external influences as the result of "free choice."

Finally, the opinion underscores that not all liberties are created equal. Governments have essential duties to protect our fundamental freedoms. But in providing disincentives to unhealthy products such as SSB, the government simply is discouraging the consumption of less healthful products. "Although a central responsibility of government is to protect foundational liberties from unwarranted intervention, it does not necessarily follow that fundamental liberties are threatened when public policy discourages consumption of unhealthy products or prohibits government spending on them," the opinion states. "The personal pleasure to be derived from consumption of SSBs is absolutely worthy of consideration, and yet such pleasure does not rise to the level of a fundamental freedom."


Story Source:

The above story is based on materials provided by Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Nancy Kass, Kenneth Hecht, Amy Paul, Kerry Birnbach. Ethics and Obesity Prevention: Ethical Considerations in 3 Approaches to Reducing Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. American Journal of Public Health, 2014; e1 DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301708

Cite This Page:

Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. "Is 'Nanny State' ethical when policing obesity?." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 19 March 2014. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140319143738.htm>.
Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. (2014, March 19). Is 'Nanny State' ethical when policing obesity?. ScienceDaily. Retrieved August 1, 2014 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140319143738.htm
Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. "Is 'Nanny State' ethical when policing obesity?." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140319143738.htm (accessed August 1, 2014).

Share This




More Health & Medicine News

Friday, August 1, 2014

Featured Research

from universities, journals, and other organizations


Featured Videos

from AP, Reuters, AFP, and other news services

House Republicans Vote to Sue Obama Over Healthcare Law

House Republicans Vote to Sue Obama Over Healthcare Law

Reuters - US Online Video (July 31, 2014) The Republican-led House of Representatives votes to sue President Obama, accusing him of overstepping his executive authority in making changes to the Affordable Care Act. Mana Rabiee reports. Video provided by Reuters
Powered by NewsLook.com
Despite Health Questions, E-Cigs Are Beneficial: Study

Despite Health Questions, E-Cigs Are Beneficial: Study

Newsy (July 31, 2014) Citing 81 previous studies, new research out of London suggests the benefits of smoking e-cigarettes instead of regular ones outweighs the risks. Video provided by Newsy
Powered by NewsLook.com
Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida

Dangerous Bacteria Kills One in Florida

AP (July 31, 2014) Sarasota County, Florida health officials have issued a warning against eating raw oysters and exposing open wounds to coastal and inland waters after a dangerous bacteria killed one person and made another sick. (July 31) Video provided by AP
Powered by NewsLook.com
Health Insurers' Profits Slide

Health Insurers' Profits Slide

Reuters - Business Video Online (July 30, 2014) Obamacare-related costs were said to be behind the profit plunge at Wellpoint and Humana, but Wellpoint sees the new exchanges boosting its earnings for the full year. Fred Katayama reports. Video provided by Reuters
Powered by NewsLook.com

Search ScienceDaily

Number of stories in archives: 140,361

Find with keyword(s):
Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily for related topics and research stories.

Save/Print:
Share:

Breaking News:
from the past week

In Other News

... from NewsDaily.com

Science News

Health News

Environment News

Technology News



Save/Print:
Share:

Free Subscriptions


Get the latest science news with ScienceDaily's free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

Get Social & Mobile


Keep up to date with the latest news from ScienceDaily via social networks and mobile apps:

Have Feedback?


Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily -- we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?
Mobile: iPhone Android Web
Follow: Facebook Twitter Google+
Subscribe: RSS Feeds Email Newsletters
Latest Headlines Health & Medicine Mind & Brain Space & Time Matter & Energy Computers & Math Plants & Animals Earth & Climate Fossils & Ruins