Science News
from research organizations

Artificial intelligence authors crowdsourced interactive fiction

Date:
September 2, 2015
Source:
Georgia Institute of Technology
Summary:
Researchers have developed a new artificially intelligent system that crowdsources plots for interactive stories, which are popular in video games and let players choose different branching story options.
Share:
FULL STORY

Georgia Institute of Technology researchers have developed a new artificially intelligent system that crowdsources plots for interactive stories, which are popular in video games and let players choose different branching story options.

With potentially limitless crowdsourced plot points, the system could allow for more creative stories and an easier method for interactive narrative generation. Current AI models for games have a limited number of scenarios, no matter what a player chooses. They depend on a dataset already programmed into a model by experts.

Using the Georgia Tech approach, one might imagine a Star Wars game using online fan fiction to let the AI system generate countless paths for a player to take.

"Our open interactive narrative system learns genre models from crowdsourced example stories so that the player can perform different actions and still receive a coherent story experience," says Mark Riedl, lead investigator and associate professor of interactive computing at Georgia Tech.

A test of the AI system, called Scheherazade IF (Interactive Fiction) -- a reference to the fabled Arabic queen and storyteller -- showed that it can achieve near human-level authoring.

"When enough data is available and that data sufficiently covers all aspects of the game experience, the system was able to meet or come close to meeting human performance in creating a playable story," says Riedl.

The researchers evaluated the AI system by measuring the number of "commonsense" errors (e.g. scenes out of sequence) found by players, as well as players' subjective experiences for things such as enjoyment and coherence of story.

Three test groups played through two interactive stories -- a bank robbery and a date to the movies -- in order to measure performance of three narrative generators: the AI story generator, a human-programmed generator or a random story generator.

For the bank robbery story, the AI system performed identically to the human-programmed generator in terms of errors reported by players, with a median of three each. The random generator produced a median of 12.5 errors reported.

For the movie date scenario, the median values of errors reported were three (human), five (AI) and 15 (random). This shows the AI system performing at 83.3 percent of the human-programmed generator.

As for the play experience itself, the human and AI generators compared favorably for coherence, player involvement, enjoyment and story recognition.

The creators say that they are seeking to inject more creative scenarios into the system. Right now, the AI plays it safe with the crowdsourced content, producing what one might expect in different genres. But opportunities exist to train Scheherazade (just like its namesake implies) to surprise and immerse those in future interactive experiences.

The impact of this research can support not only online storytelling for entertainment, but also digital storytelling used in online course education or corporate training.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Georgia Institute of Technology. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Cite This Page:

Georgia Institute of Technology. "Artificial intelligence authors crowdsourced interactive fiction." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 2 September 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150902135120.htm>.
Georgia Institute of Technology. (2015, September 2). Artificial intelligence authors crowdsourced interactive fiction. ScienceDaily. Retrieved May 23, 2017 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150902135120.htm
Georgia Institute of Technology. "Artificial intelligence authors crowdsourced interactive fiction." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150902135120.htm (accessed May 23, 2017).

RELATED STORIES