Cruise tourists are not influenced by extended shopping opportunities. They spend very little money during the port of call even when they are offered an increased number of spending options.
Bergen is Norway's largest cruise harbour, hosting more than 300 cruise ships every season. The local tourist industry, media, port authorities and politicians often praise the ever increasing number of cruise arrivals to Bergen, but for no good reason, according to Professor Svein Larsen at the Department of Psychosocial Science at the University of Bergen (UiB).
A study newly published by Larsen and colleague Katharina Wolff in Tourism Management Perspectives, shows that cruise passengers' expenditures do not vary as a function of spending opportunities. In this study, the researchers compared different types of tourists' expenditures on normal weekdays including Saturday, when shops and other services tend to be open, to expenditures on Sun- and holydays, when most shops tend to be closed.
"Even if more possibilities to spend money arise, cruise tourists do not spend more. But land tourists do," says Larsen.
"The myth that cruise passengers' expenditures are low because there is "nothing to spend money on," as a Norwegian emeritus minister of trade phrased it in a local newspaper in 2013, is simply not true."
The minister's phrase came after an earlier Larsen et al.-study published in 2013, which raised some debate. The study indicated that it is probably the length of stay on land, which is the most crucial determinant for how much money cruise passengers spend. As it is today, cruise tourists are normally not allowed much time in each and every port, thus limiting their possibilities to spend money during port visits.
"After a short morning or afternoon stroll in the city, cruise passengers typically hurry back to the ship where they can enjoy their already payed for lunch or afternoon-tea" says Larsen.
Few return to a destination
Another myth about cruise tourists is that they want to return to a destination visited on the cruise on a later occasion. Many claim that when cruise tourists experience how beautiful for example the Norwegian fjords and the city of Bergen are, they will return as non-cruise tourists later.
But, the new study shows that among tourists who had visited Norway before, cruise tourists had visited as cruise tourists and land tourists had visited as land tourists. Similarly, revisit intentions, the expressed desire to come back to Bergen/Norway, are significantly higher among land tourists than among cruise tourists. At the same time, cruise tourists express a higher wish to return as cruise tourists also in the future, and they express a higher wish to return as cruise tourists than as land tourists.
"It simply seems as if cruise tourism does not have any value as a promotor of Norway as a holiday destination at all," says Professor Svein Larsen.
Cite This Page: