Preliminary findings of a five-year search by a university-industry research team, coordinated by University of Guelph environmental biologist Prof. Greg Boland, show that using selected fungi can appreciably reduce the herbicide rate needed to effectively control dandelions (Taraxacum officinale).

The ban of 2,4-D in many public areas in Ontario municipalities, due to concerns about high-volume pesticide usage, has increased the need for an effective, non-chemical method of managing dandelions.

"Ideally, a biological control agent (BCA) would control dandelions on its own, but this may not be enough," says Parry Schnick, a former University of Guelph graduate student working with Boland. "A combination of BCA and low rates of a herbicide, however, may effectively manage weeds while decreasing the amount of chemical herbicide required."

Integrating fungi with reduced herbicide doses could decrease the cost of a commercial weed management system, and can have the advantage of being host-specific, says Schnick. So the team is testing fungi for the properties required to become a successful BCA (also known as a bioherbicide). These fungi, or plant pathogens, are found naturally on dandelions, or in soil or plant debris.

The fungi attack dandelions by forming lesions on their leaves. This either kills the plant or decreases the energy available to it, making it less competitive. Wounds caused by the BCA which don't kill the dandelion may allow other natural pests to take hold and kill or weaken the weed.

Controlling dandelions is tough. They survive a wide range of environmental conditions, produce many airborne seeds, and are perennial, which means they survive winters to grow during two or more summers. Evaluating and developing a commercially acceptable bioherbicide has been a narrowing-down process. Researchers from across the country – from the University of Guelph, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, and MacDonald College of McGill University - collected diseased dandelion plants and isolated fungi that caused damage. The pathogens were then screened for specific traits such as efficacy, host range and ease of production.

Schnick tested three of the identified pathogens in combination with reduced doses of three chemical herbicides (2,4-D, diquat and glyphosate). Their effectiveness was tested under laboratory and field conditions at the Guelph Turfgrass Institute. Each pathogen and herbicide was also tested alone, to compare single and combination treatments.

Results showed that some BCA-herbicide combinations were more effective than herbicides or BCAs alone, in both the lab and field. However, combination treatments were less effective under field conditions, suggesting environmental factors may play a role in overall effectiveness.

The next step in developing a commercial product is to investigate storage and shelf-life qualities of the BCAs, as well as production costs. If additional research and assessment is carried out and found to be promising, researchers predict a BCA product could be available in the near future. For further information on lawn care and dandelion control, contact the Guelph Turfgrass Institute at (519) 767-5009 (press 1), or visit http://www.uoguelph.ca/GTI/.

This research was sponsored by Dow AgroSciences Canada, BioProducts Centre, Philom Bios, Saskatchewan Wheat Pool, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council.

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

• Fungus
• Agriculture and Food
• Organic
• Microbes and More
• Soil Types
• Endangered Plants

• Weed
• Phytopathology
• Herbicide
• Weed control
• Organic lawn management
• Square foot gardening