Aug. 4, 2006 Genetic analysis of living spruce trees provides strong evidence for the presence of a tree refuge in Alaska during the height of the last glacial period (17,000 to 25,000 years ago), and suggests that trees cannot migrate in response to climate change as quickly as some scientists thought.
The DNA survey and analysis, led by researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, will be posted online this week ahead of regular publication by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“White spruce (Picea glauca) is a dominant species in the boreal forests of North America,” said Lynn L. Anderson, lead author and doctoral student. “In the face of global warming, we need to study how plant and animal populations have responded to climate change in the past, to better predict what will happen in the future.”
In their study, the researchers analyzed chloroplast DNA from 24 spruce forests in Alaska and Canada. Because chloroplast DNA contains genes inherited from only one parent, there is no confusing genetic recombination to take into account.
“We found a significant pattern in the geographic distribution of the chloroplast DNA haplotypes (groups of individuals with similar sequences of base pairs of genetic material) that differentiates into two regions,” Anderson said.
The chloroplast DNA, the researchers write, “offers compelling evidence that white spruce survived the last glacial maximum and probably some of the previous glacial episodes in Alaska. This survival must have been facilitated by the existence of favorable microhabitats … and by adaptations of these trees to harsh climate.”
The DNA data help resolve an old controversy over the manner in which trees had migrated in response to past climate change, said Feng Sheng Hu, professor of plant biology and geology at Illinois and corresponding author of the paper.
“One view is that trees were restricted to areas south of the continental ice sheets covering North America, and then migrated extremely rapidly as the climate grew warmer,” Hu said. “The other view is that there was a refuge in the ice-free areas north of the ice sheets, and spruce trees expanded within those areas as the climate warmed. It now seems clear that a glacial refuge existed, and the trees advanced from at least two directions.”
Based on the data, it also appears likely that the migration rate was lower than previously thought.
“Our results suggest that estimated rates of tree migration from fossil pollen records are too high and that the ability of trees to keep pace with global warming is more limited than previously thought,” said Hu, who has studied plant responses to climate change for 15 years. “Additional analysis of fossil pollen in sediments, as well as DNA data from living trees, could help pin down the actual rate of tree movement over time.”
The researchers’ findings also illustrate the great resilience of white spruce – and perhaps other tree species – to climate change, and have important implications for the future.
For example, isolated populations of trees might persist in locally suitable habitats for long periods after regional climatic conditions have become unfavorable as a result of rapid global warming. This resilience might reduce the probability of species extinction and allow time for efforts at biodiversity conservation.
Or maybe not.
“Our study looked at the past, before humans had made any significant impact on climate,” said Hu. “In the future, both human and natural disturbances will likely interact with climate change to reduce resilience and trigger larger ecological shifts.”
The study “illustrates the power of using genetic techniques to answer paleoecological questions relevant to global change,” said co-author Ken N. Paige, professor and head of animal biology who has studied the genetic structure and dynamics of plant and animal populations for more than 20 years. “It’s likely that more new insights can be gained by studying other plant and animal species with this approach.”
In addition to Anderson, Hu and Paige, the other co-authors are David M. Nelson, postdoctoral research associate at Illinois, and Rémy J. Petit at the French National Institute of Agronomy. The work was funded in part by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the National Science Foundation.
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.