Science News
from research organizations

How Are Phenotypic Differences Between Sexes Related To Phenotypic Variation Within Sexes?

Date:
January 11, 2007
Source:
University of Chicago Press Journals
Summary:
It has long been recognized that sexually dimorphic traits -- traits that are systematically different between members of different sex in the same species, such as peacocks' tail feathers -- tend to vary a great deal among individual males, and that much of this within-sex variation depends on individual condition. Indeed, theory predicts that sexual dimorphism will evolve based on condition dependence so that, among traits, a more pronounced difference between male and female should be associated with a stronger response to variation in condition.
Share:
       
FULL STORY

Telostylinus angusticollis males vary enormously in body size and shape -- these wild males are aggregated on the bark of a rotting Acacia longifolia tree in Sydney, Australia.
Credit: Photo courtesy of R. Bonduriansky

It has long been recognized that sexually dimorphic traits -- traits that are systematically different between members of different sex in the same species, such as peacocks' tail feathers -- tend to vary a great deal among individual males, and that much of this within-sex variation depends on individual condition. Indeed, theory predicts that sexual dimorphism will evolve based on condition dependence so that, among traits, a more pronounced difference between male and female should be associated with a stronger response to variation in condition.

Russell Bonduriansky (University of New South Wales in Sydney) tested this prediction using the giant stilt-legged fly Telostylinus angusticollis, which breeds on rotting tree trunks along Australia's east coast. Analysis of multiple body shape components revealed a remarkable congruence between the degree of sexual dimorphism and the strength of condition dependence, accounting for nearly all of the variation in these traits.

"There is no sexual dimorphism without condition dependence in this species -- they are conceptually and biologically inseparable," says Bonduriansky. "The evidence suggests that sexual dimorphism is a pleiotropic consequence of genes that generate condition dependence." These findings call for a unification of evolutionary and genetic models of sexual dimorphism and condition dependence.

Founded in 1867, The American Naturalist is one of the world's most renowned, peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and population and integrative biology research. AN emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses--all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.

Reference: Bonduriansky, Russell, "The evolution of condition dependent sexual dimorphism." The American Naturalist: January 2007.


Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by University of Chicago Press Journals. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.


Cite This Page:

University of Chicago Press Journals. "How Are Phenotypic Differences Between Sexes Related To Phenotypic Variation Within Sexes?." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 11 January 2007. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070110180929.htm>.
University of Chicago Press Journals. (2007, January 11). How Are Phenotypic Differences Between Sexes Related To Phenotypic Variation Within Sexes?. ScienceDaily. Retrieved July 2, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070110180929.htm
University of Chicago Press Journals. "How Are Phenotypic Differences Between Sexes Related To Phenotypic Variation Within Sexes?." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070110180929.htm (accessed July 2, 2015).

Share This Page: