Deep cuts in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions consistent with the UK’s 80% greenhouse gas emission reduction target by 2050 are technologically and economically feasible. However, these cuts will require fundamental shifts in technology and behaviour. Much more ambitious policies are needed if the 2050 target, as well as 2020 targets for CO2 and renewable energy, are to be met.
hese are among the key findings obtained by UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC) researchers in a recently published working report.
The report explores CO2 emission reductions of 26-39% (from 1990 levels) by 2020 and 40-90% by 2050. The deep cuts in emissions will require three things:
Under all scenarios, de-carbonising the power sector is key. This will enable further low-carbon choices in the transport sector (e.g. plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles) and in buildings (electric heat pumps). Social policies to enable demand reduction and a bridge to new transport infrastructures are required.
A number of the low-carbon electricity technologies are not yet available on a commercial basis. Government support is urgently needed for the demonstration and commercialisation of CCS and renewable technologies. Reliable carbon pricing, for example through a strengthened EU Emissions Trading Scheme, will be necessary for the deployment of all low-carbon electricity technologies.
Emission reductions of 40% - 90% by 2050 will entail significant costs. The annual loss in welfare could range from £5 - £52 billion in 2050. In particular, moving from a 60% to an 80% reduction almost doubles welfare costs from £20 - £39 billion. Although these numbers are large, they need to be set in the context of likely UK GDP in excess of £3 trillion by 2050.
The additional cost of obtaining an extra unit of CO2 reduction (marginal cost) could range from as low as £20/tCO2 in a 40% reduction scenario up to £300/tCO2 in the 90% scenario. The price of carbon will need to rise significantly if ambitious emission cuts are to be achieved.
The mixture of technologies and patterns of behaviour adopted by 2050 depends critically on the timing of action to reduce CO2 emissions, especially in the transport sector. Taking a long term perspective means giving greater weight to costs incurred in the more distant future. This implies early action and the selection of options with higher up-front and infrastructure costs. In transport, this means less reliance on bio-fuels and the greater diffusion of electric hybrid plug-in and hydrogen vehicles.
Report author Dr Neil Strachan of Kings College London & UKERC researcher said: “Near-term government policy should provide viable options; in the long term society through market mechanisms should decide the winning technology portfolio”.
Cite This Page: