New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Opioid abuse drops when doctors check patients' drug history

Date:
May 1, 2017
Source:
Cornell University
Summary:
There's a simple way to reduce the opioid epidemic gripping the country, according to new research: Make doctors check their patients' previous prescriptions.
Share:
FULL STORY

There's a simple way to reduce the opioid epidemic gripping the country, according to new Cornell University research: Make doctors check their patients' previous prescriptions.

The most significant response to the opioid epidemic comes from state governments. Nearly every state now has a database that tracks every prescription for opioids like OxyContin, Percocet and Vicodin. Using these databases, doctors and pharmacists can retrieve a patient's history to decide whether they are an opioid abuser before prescribing them drugs.

Such databases reduce opioid abuse among Medicare recipients -- but only when laws require doctors to consult them, according to a Cornell health care economist and her colleague. Their study refutes previous research suggesting the databases have no effect on opioid abuse. The paper is forthcoming in the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.

"The main issue is getting providers to change their prescribing behavior. The majority of opioids that people abuse start in the medical system as a legitimate prescription," said co-author Colleen Carey, assistant professor of policy analysis and management in the College of Human Ecology. Her co-author is Thomas Buchmueller of the University of Michigan.

States that implemented a "must access" database saw a decline in the number of Medicare recipients who got more than a seven-months' supply in a six-month period. And there was a decrease in those who filled a prescription before the previous prescription's supply had been used.

"Doctor shopping" also dropped. Medicare opioid users who got prescriptions from five or more doctors -- a common marker for "doctor shopping" -- fell by 8 percent; the number of those who got opioids from five or more pharmacies declined by more than 15 percent

On the flip side, Medicare patients appeared to evade the new regulations by traveling to a less-regulated state.

Although the study looked only at Medicare recipients, the findings are likely to translate to the general population, the researchers said. The effects were especially large for low-income disabled users and for those who obtain opioid prescriptions from a high number of doctors; both groups have the highest rates of misuse and abuse, Carey said.

The strongest effects were in states with the strictest laws, such as New York, which require doctors to check the opioid history of "every patient, every time." But even states with laws requiring access only under certain circumstances reduced doctor shopping.

Until recently Medicare has had very few legislative tools to curtail the epidemic

And insurance companies have little incentive, because opioids are relatively cheap, costing about $1.60 per day in the study's sample. And opioids don't hit Medicare insurers in the bottom line, making up only 3 percent of their total drug costs, Carey said.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Cornell University. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Thomas C. Buchmueller, Colleen Carey. The Effect of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs on Opioid Utilization in Medicare. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2017 [abstract]

Cite This Page:

Cornell University. "Opioid abuse drops when doctors check patients' drug history." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 1 May 2017. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170501131756.htm>.
Cornell University. (2017, May 1). Opioid abuse drops when doctors check patients' drug history. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 16, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170501131756.htm
Cornell University. "Opioid abuse drops when doctors check patients' drug history." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170501131756.htm (accessed April 16, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES