New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Voter behavior influenced by hot weather

Higher voter turnout and an increase in votes for the incumbent political party are linked to state-level increases in temperature during US presidential elections

August 16, 2017
Hot weather can affect human behavior and has been linked to political rebellions and riots. A new study, the first to examine the influence of changes in temperature on peaceful and democratic political behavior, finds that voter behavior can change with increases in state-level temperature. For every 10C rise in temperature, voter turnout increased by 1.4 percent. In addition, when the weather was warmer, citizens chose to vote for the incumbent party.

Political rebellions and riots have been associated with warmer weather, but until now, there has been little research on its potential influence on peaceful and democratic political behavior. A new study, published in the open-access journal Frontiers in Psychology, has uncovered a connection between changes in temperature and voting behavior in the United States of America.

"We found that increases in state-level temperatures from one election to another are related to increases in state-level voter turnout, and increases in votes for the incumbent party," says Jasper Van Assche, who completed this research in the Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology at Ghent University, Belgium.

"Voter behavior data from each state was collected for all the U.S. presidential elections from 1960 to 2016 and compared to the difference between maximum temperature on voting day and that of the previous election day," explains Van Assche. "We found that for every 10C increase in temperature, voter turnout increased by 1.4%."

The study also revealed that a rise in temperature motivated some citizens to cast their vote for the smaller political parties (Greens, Libertarians, Independents). Counteracting this, was the finding that warmer weather was a stronger motivator for some citizens to vote for the government currently in power.

"Although these effects are rather small compared to the 'usual suspects' that predict voting, they might play a role in close races," says Van Assche.

The study details one such case; the 2000 presidential election. Applying the findings of the study, Van Assche and his co-authors suggests a mere 10C (1.8oF) increase in temperature may have made Al Gore the 43rd U.S. President instead of George W. Bush, as Gore would have won in Florida.

Van Assche is keen to explain that his results were not affected by other factors that can influence voter behavior.

"Importantly, the relationship between voter behavior and turnout remained true even when we took into account the 'usual suspects' that can have an effect -- the president being available for reappointment, the incumbent president being elected or not (Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Gerald Ford were Vice Presidents), presidential approval ratings, whether the president's party had a majority in Congress during the two last years, and change in state gross domestic product (GDP), amongst others."

The study analyzed changes in temperature (an increase or decrease in temperature on voting day, when compared to the previous election day), rather than absolute temperature because of the latter's potential effects on the results. An absolute temperature of 30oC would be a normal temperature for California, but hot in Alaska. Moreover, absolute temperature can be linked to other factors that may affect voting behavior. For example, poverty is generally higher in countries with hotter climates.

It is hoped that future studies will delve deeper and increase our knowledge of what can influence voter behavior.

"There is a large amount of research on voter behavior, but little attention has been paid to the seemingly illogical factors that can influence the way people vote. Future studies could expand our understanding by tapping into smaller levels of analyses (e.g., cities or counties) or by including emotions (such as anger) which might explain some of the effects," concludes Van Assche.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Frontiers. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:

  1. Jasper Van Assche, Alain Van Hiel, Jonas Stadeus, Brad J. Bushman, David De Cremer, Arne Roets. When the Heat Is On: The Effect of Temperature on Voter Behavior in Presidential Elections. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017; 8 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00929

Cite This Page:

Frontiers. "Voter behavior influenced by hot weather." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 16 August 2017. <>.
Frontiers. (2017, August 16). Voter behavior influenced by hot weather. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 13, 2024 from
Frontiers. "Voter behavior influenced by hot weather." ScienceDaily. (accessed April 13, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily